Michigan House Bill HB4251

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/9/23
• Refer: 3/9/23
• Report Pass: 4/20/23
• Engrossed: 5/2/23
• Refer: 5/3/23
• Report Pass: 5/9/23
• Refer: 5/9/23
• Enrolled: 5/11/23
• Chaptered: 6/7/23
• Passed: 6/7/23

Caption

Traffic control: driver license; penalties for operating a vehicle while sending or receiving a message on an electronic wireless device; enhance. Amends secs. 319b, 320a & 320d of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.319b et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4250'23, HB 4252'23

Impact

The bill lays out clear consequences for individuals caught using electronic devices while driving, particularly for commercial drivers. It seeks to impose immediate suspension or revocation of driving privileges for those found responsible for such infractions, which could significantly deter illicit behavior on the road. By establishing these heightened penalties, the bill aims to protect both drivers and pedestrians by potentially reducing the volume of accidents attributed to distractions caused by mobile devices.

Summary

House Bill 4251 is a legislative measure aimed at enhancing penalties for operators of vehicles who engage in sending or receiving messages while driving. This bill amends sections of an existing traffic act to include stricter regulations and consequences for violations related to the use of electronic wireless devices while operating motor vehicles. The intention behind HB 4251 is to increase road safety and reduce instances of distracted driving, which has been a growing concern in the state of Michigan.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 4251 appears to be supportive among safety advocates and lawmakers who argue that the issue of distracted driving has reached epidemic levels. These supporters stress the need for tougher laws to ensure public safety. However, there may be concerns from some members of the business community, particularly those employing commercial drivers, regarding the additional burdens and implications these penalties could carry for drivers and businesses alike.

Contention

Notable points of contention arising from the discussions around the bill include fears that penalties may be too harsh, particularly for commercial drivers who might rely on their devices for navigation or communication. Critics argue that while road safety is paramount, the law should also account for the realities of modern driving demands and not unduly penalize necessary communication. The discussions reflect a desire to balance public safety with practical considerations for drivers in the state.