Michigan Senate Bill SB0267

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/13/23

Caption

Traffic control: driver license; citizenship or legal presence requirement for obtaining a driver license; remove. Amends secs. 50a, 51a, 232, 302, 303, 307 & 314 of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.50a et seq.).

Impact

The changes proposed in SB 267 could significantly impact the way that driver licenses are issued in Michigan. By allowing individuals without regard to immigration status to be recognized as residents, the bill aims to create more inclusive pathways for obtaining licenses. This could lead to increased compliance with traffic laws among non-resident individuals who may have previously avoided driving due to fear of legal consequences surrounding their status. Additionally, this bill includes stipulations relating to driver records, providing more stringent oversight for maintaining personal information related to license issuance and keeping it secure from unauthorized access.

Summary

Senate Bill 267 aims to amend sections of the Michigan Vehicle Code, specifically addressing regulations around the issuance and renewal of operator's and chauffeur's licenses. The bill introduces definitions for 'residence address' and 'resident,' clarifying that citizenship or immigration status shall not be considered when determining if an individual is a resident of the state. This amendment is intended to broaden access to licenses, ensuring that more individuals, regardless of their legal status, can obtain necessary operator privileges under certain conditions.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for advancing the rights of residents, it has faced criticism over concerns regarding public safety, with opponents arguing that it may encourage individuals who are not legally present to operate vehicles without proper oversight. The implications of such a change raise questions about the state’s responsibility to ensure public safety on the roads. Furthermore, the provisions concerning disclosure of personal information to governmental agencies and the restriction against sharing this information for immigration enforcement have sparked debate about privacy and the protection of residents' data.