Michigan House Bill HB4921

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/18/23
• Refer: 7/18/23
• Report Pass: 5/22/24
• Engrossed: 6/27/24
• Refer: 7/30/24

Caption

Traffic control: speed restrictions; speed limit enforcement mechanisms in school zones: provide for. Amends sec. 907 of 1949 PA 300 (MCL 257.907) & adds secs. 79g & 627c. TIE BAR WITH: HB 5726'24

Impact

The introduction of HB 4921 entails several changes to existing legislation surrounding civil infractions. Notably, it stipulates that drivers who exceed a school zone's speed limit by 10 miles per hour or more will face a civil fine ranging from $100 to $150, contingent upon the duration of a public awareness campaign prior to the system's implementation. Additionally, counties or local authorities can employ a private vendor for the processing of fines, streamlining the administrative process associated with enforcing speed limits through these automated systems. This legislation, therefore, reinforces traffic safety measures while simultaneously establishing a new revenue stream for relevant public safety initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 4921 is a legislative measure that amends the Michigan Vehicle Code to allow counties and local authorities to use speed detection systems in school zones. The bill defines a 'speed detection system' as an automated mechanism that employs radar or lidar technology to monitor and record the speed of vehicles. The intent behind this bill is to enhance the enforcement of speed limits in school zones, which are critical areas for the safety of children and pedestrians. By implementing these systems, the state aims to decrease speeding in these vulnerable zones and promote safer environments for schoolchildren.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding HB 4921 appears mixed. Proponents argue that this legislation is a necessary tool to enhance safety in school environments, offering a preventative approach to managing vehicle speeds. They contend that automated enforcement can significantly reduce speeding incidents, contributing to the well-being of children in school zones. Conversely, opponents raise concerns about privacy implications and the potential for overreach, fearing that increased surveillance through automated systems could lead to an erosion of civil liberties. This tension highlights the debate between maintaining public safety and ensuring individual freedoms.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HB 4921 revolves around the use of automated enforcement technologies. Critics argue that reliance on speed detection systems can lead to increased ticketing without proper context for enforcement, as the absence of an officer's participation may undermine accountability. Furthermore, there are reservations about the effectiveness of these systems in genuinely improving safety rather than merely serving as a revenue-generating apparatus for local governments. The introduction of this bill has ignited important discussions on how best to balance enforcement with community trust and transparency.