Michigan House Bill HB4946

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/7/23
• Refer: 9/7/23
• Report Pass: 10/3/23

Caption

Crimes: weapons; possession of firearms and ammunition by persons convicted of misdemeanor involving domestic violence; prohibit. Amends sec. 224f of 1931 PA 328 (MCL 750.224f).

Impact

If enacted, HB 4946 would directly impact the rights of individuals convicted of specified felonies and misdemeanors involving domestic violence, extending the period during which they are prohibited from possessing firearms and ammunition. For felonies, the prohibition lasts until three years after serving time and paying fines, and for specified felonies, this extends to five years. For misdemeanors involving domestic violence, individuals are barred for eight years. Such restrictions aim to enhance public safety by reducing access to firearms among potentially dangerous individuals.

Summary

House Bill 4946 aims to amend the Michigan Penal Code regarding the possession, use, transport, and distribution of firearms and ammunition by individuals convicted of certain crimes, specifically felonies and misdemeanors involving domestic violence. The bill establishes specific time frames for individuals with felony convictions to regain the right to possess firearms or ammunition after fulfilling certain conditions, including serving their sentence and completing probation or parole. It clearly delineates the actions prohibited to those with convictions, reinforcing the connection between criminal behavior and firearm access.

Contention

While HB 4946 has support based on concerns for public safety and reducing gun violence, there may be contention regarding the impact on rehabilitation. Critics argue that excessively long prohibitions may hinder reintegration into society for those who have served their time. Moreover, defining the specific felonies and how the law will be enforced could lead to debates about fairness and the effectiveness of such restrictions in preventing future crimes. The balance between protecting the rights of reformed individuals and maintaining community safety appears to be at the core of the discussions surrounding this bill.