Health: abortion; revised judicature act of 1961; revise to reflect repealed abortion laws. Amends sec. 5711 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.5711). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4949'23
Impact
The implications of HB 4953 are significant for state laws pertaining to property rights and tenant protections. By specifying conditions under which forcible entry may occur, the bill adjusts the balance of power between property owners and tenants. It sets forth a clearer guideline that could affect judicial proceedings related to eviction and property access, aligning legal procedures with contemporary societal norms and legal interpretations. Additionally, the bill’s tie bar with House Bill 4949 indicates a deliberate legislative strategy to address issues arising from the repeal of abortion laws as they pertain to personal rights.
Summary
House Bill 4953 seeks to amend the 1961 Public Act 236, also known as the Revised Judicature Act, specifically targeting Section 5711. The bill aims to reinforce and clarify the law regarding entry onto premises, stating that no individual can make an entry unless permitted by law and must do so in a non-violent manner unless certain conditions regarding forcible possession are met. The proposed amendments align with recent changes in abortion laws that necessitate an update in the legal framework governing property and occupancy rights, highlighting the interconnectedness of legislative changes across different sectors.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 4953 appears to be a mixture of support and concern. Advocates for tenant rights and property law reform generally endorse the bill, viewing it as a necessary clarification that upholds individual rights while ensuring property owners can retain control over their premises. However, there are apprehensions among some legislators and community members who worry that the changes might inadvertently infringe on tenant protections or be misapplied in future legal disputes. This spectrum of viewpoints illustrates a broader conversation about the complexities of property laws in relation to individual rights.
Contention
Notably, the bill has sparked discussions around the potential consequences of its provisions. Critics point out that the language surrounding 'peaceable manner' and 'forcible entry' may lead to subjective interpretations in legal contexts. There are concerns that while intending to establish clear guidelines, the bill could create gray areas that affect vulnerable tenants, allowing landlords to exploit loopholes. The tie bar with HB 4949 further complicates the analysis of this measure, making its full implications contingent on the passage of concurrent legislative efforts.
Health: abortion; occupational code; revise to reflect repealed abortion laws. Amends sec. 1810 of 1980 PA 299 (MCL 339.1810). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0474'23
Criminal procedure: expunction; reference to crime of partial birth abortion; remove to reflect repeal. Amends sec. 1 of 1965 PA 213 (MCL 780.621). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4949'23
Civil procedure: costs and fees; revised judicature act; revise to reflect the distribution of certain fines related to automated speed enforcement systems. Amends sec. 8379 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.8379). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4132'23
Torts: medical malpractice; revised judicature act of 1961; amend to reflect amendments to the public health code. Amends sec. 5838a of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.5838a). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5477'24
Traffic control: civil infraction procedures; revised judicature act; revise to reflect distribution of certain fines to school districts. Amends secs. 8379 & 8396 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.8379 & 600.8396). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4928'23, HB 4930'23
Family law: parenting time; reference to section 7b of the child custody act of 1970 in the revised judicature act of 1961; modify. Amends sec. 1035 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.1035). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4217'25