Michigan House Bill HB5108

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 10/10/23
• Refer: 10/10/23

Caption

Natural resources: fishing; allowable catch per species and percentage quota for commercial fishing; provide for. Amends secs. 47301, 47302, 47303, 47305, 47307, 47308, 47309, 47310, 47311, 47312, 47313, 47314, 47315, 47316, 47317, 47319, 47320, 47321, 47322, 47323, 47324, 47326, 47328, 47329 & 48724 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.47301 et seq.); adds secs. 47304 & 47363 & repeals secs. 46102, 47301a, 47330 - 47332, 47334, 47901 - 47905 & 48901 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.46101 et seq.).

Impact

This bill has a significant impact on existing regulations governing commercial fishing within Michigan's waters. By establishing quotas based on scientific estimation of fish populations, the legislation aims to prevent overfishing and protect aquatic species from depletion. The adjustments made in the bill require commercial fishers to adhere to stricter regulations regarding their catch limits and fishing practices, thereby promoting healthier ecosystems and sustainable fishing cycles. Furthermore, the bill emphasizes the importance of sound scientific management and data collection to inform future regulatory decisions.

Summary

House Bill 5108 amends provisions of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act related to commercial fishing in Michigan's Great Lakes. The bill modifies existing regulations concerning allowable catch per species and introduces specified quotas for commercial fishers. One of the key objectives of the amendment is to enhance the management of fish populations within the Great Lakes, ensuring sustainable harvesting practices are upheld amidst increasing pressures on fish stocks. The legislation seeks to balance the interests of commercial fishers with environmental stewardship.

Contention

Notably, there may be contention surrounding the quotas assigned to different fish species, particularly as stakeholders in the commercial fishing industry express varying perspectives on how these quotas could affect their livelihoods. Some may argue that the quotas are too restrictive, risking their economic stability, while environmental advocates may feel the measures are essential for long-term sustainability. Challenges about compliance, enforcement, and administrative burden are also likely to arise as regulatory bodies adjust to the new parameters established by HB 5108.