Michigan House Bill HB5143

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/9/23
• Report Pass: 11/9/23
• Refer: 10/12/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23
• Engrossed: 11/1/23
• Refer: 11/2/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Enrolled: 11/9/23
• Chaptered: 12/31/23
• Passed: 12/31/23

Caption

Campaign finance: other; artificial intelligence; define. Amends sec. 2 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.202). TIE BAR WITH: HB 5141'23

Impact

The introduction of HB 5143 could lead to profound changes in how campaign financing is regulated, especially regarding the use of AI technologies in political campaigns. By outlining specific definitions and including AI under the umbrella of campaign financing regulations, the bill may help safeguard the electoral process against potential abuses associated with automated decision-making technologies. The effective date of this legislation is set for February 13, 2024, signaling a timely adaptation to the use of technology in politics.

Summary

House Bill 5143 is a significant update to Michigan's political activity and campaign finance regulations, particularly in the context of the evolving technological landscape. The bill amends section 2 of the 1976 PA 388 to formally define 'artificial intelligence' (AI) within the framework of campaign finance. This definition highlights AI's role in influencing electoral processes, including making predictions and recommendations that affect real or virtual environments. With this new provision, the bill acknowledges the growing impact of AI on political activities, setting a standard for future regulatory measures.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding this bill appears to be cautiously optimistic among proponents who recognize the necessity of regulating emerging technologies like AI. They argue that clear definitions and regulations are essential for maintaining the integrity of campaign finance in an increasingly digital world. However, there are concerns among critics about the vagueness that may surround implementation and enforcement. Questions remain regarding how these definitions will be applied in practice and what implications this might have for political groups leveraging AI tools in their campaigns.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns from certain lawmakers and advocacy groups who worry that the bill could inadvertently restrict the free flow of information and innovation in political campaigning. Critics argue that imposing stringent definitions and regulations on AI could stifle creativity and limit the capacity of campaigns to engage with voters effectively. Additionally, the tie-bar with House Bill 5141 may create further legislative complexities, necessitating close scrutiny as both bills advance through the legislative process.