Michigan House Bill HB5816

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/12/24
• Refer: 6/12/24
• Report Pass: 11/12/24
• Engrossed: 12/12/24
• Refer: 12/18/24

Caption

Cities: home rule; election of charter commission: modify timeline requirements. Amends sec. 18 of 1909 PA 279 (MCL 117.18).

Impact

If enacted, HB 5816 would significantly impact how cities in Michigan can revise their governing charters. The bill addresses the timeline for electing a charter commission, extending it from 60 to 200 days following the majority approval from electors. Additionally, it clarifies that the charter revision commission can only submit a proposed revised charter to voters three times; if rejected three times, the commission would dissolve. This reform is intended to streamline the charter revision process, making it more predictable and less burdensome on the local government.

Summary

House Bill 5816 aims to amend section 18 of the 1909 Home Rule City Act in Michigan, focusing on the procedures and timelines related to the revision of city charters. The bill proposes to allow for a more structured approach to the charter revision process by establishing a clearer mechanism for cities to initiate a charter revision through legislative or electoral methods. Specifically, it dictates that a city must secure a 3/5 vote from its legislative body or gather sufficient signatures through a petition to prompt a general revision vote from its electors. If the electors approve the revision, a charter commission will be appointed to draft the changes.

Sentiment

General sentiment toward HB 5816 among legislators appears to be supportive, as it is seen as a way to enhance local governance by providing a clear procedure for charter revisions. Proponents suggest that this helps local authorities better reflect community needs and respond to changes over time. However, there could be concerns from some stakeholders about the limitations placed on local governments, specifically regarding the number of resubmissions allowed, which might restrict the ability of cities to revise their charters adequately.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of extending the election timeline and limiting the number of resubmissions for charter proposals. Some critics may argue that the bill could inadvertently hinder a city's responsiveness to emergent issues by requiring lengthier processes for charter changes and potentially creating bureaucratic hurdles. Others might worry that the limitations on resubmission could deny local voters the opportunity to reconsider critical governance issues adequately.