Michigan Senate Bill SB0090

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/21/23
• Refer: 2/21/23
• Report Pass: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23
• Engrossed: 5/23/23
• Report Pass: 6/6/23
• Enrolled: 6/13/23
• Chaptered: 6/20/23
• Passed: 6/20/23

Caption

Civil rights: racial discrimination; discrimination based on traits historically associated with race such as hair texture; prohibit. Amends sec. 103 of 1976 PA 453 (MCL 37.2103).

Impact

If enacted, SB0090 will specifically amend section 103 of the Civil Rights Act of 1976, thereby expanding the definition of discrimination to explicitly include certain physical traits associated with race. This change is significant as it seeks to formalize protections against a form of discrimination that has been prevalent but not explicitly addressed in existing laws. It is anticipated that the application of this amendment will widen the legal framework protecting individuals from discrimination, thereby affecting employers and institutions that are now required to adapt their policies and practices to comply with these enhanced protections.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 90 aims to amend existing civil rights legislation in Michigan, specifically enhancing protections against racial discrimination. The bill emphasizes prohibiting discriminatory practices based on traits historically associated with race, such as hair texture and protective hairstyles. This legislative effort is rooted in the desire to foster inclusivity and diversity in environments where individuals interact, such as the workplace and educational institutions. The amendment reflects a growing recognition of the cultural significance of hair and its connection to racial identity, which has long been a point of contention and discrimination in various settings.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB0090 has been largely positive, with many advocates and civil rights organizations expressing strong support for the initiative. Proponents see it as a vital step toward addressing systemic discrimination and promoting equality. However, there are some voices of dissent that argue the bill may be challenged in terms of its implementation, particularly regarding how subjective terms like 'traits historically associated with race' might be interpreted in legal contexts. Critics worry about the potential for frivolous lawsuits, suggesting that the bill could complicate the legal landscape for employers and schools.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about how the bill defines and enforces protections against discrimination based on characteristics like hair texture. Critics argue the terms may lead to ambiguity in legal interpretations and potential conflicts in enforcement. Additionally, while supporters cite the need for this legislation to combat existing biases, there are worries about unintended repercussions in workplaces, where increased scrutiny could lead to challenges in hiring and maintaining workplace standards. The interactions and debates surrounding these points highlight a crucial tension between the advancement of civil rights and the complexities tied to the enforcement of such measures.