Michigan Senate Bill SB0383

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/8/23
• Refer: 6/8/23
• Report Pass: 9/27/23
• Refer: 9/27/23
• Report Pass: 10/11/23
• Engrossed: 10/12/23
• Refer: 10/12/23
• Report Pass: 11/1/23

Caption

Civil rights: other; language access plan; require state agencies to create and implement for individuals with limited English proficiency. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0382'23

Impact

The bill mandates the development of a complaint process for individuals who feel they have been denied access based on their national origin. This empowers citizens to seek remedies for grievances related to language access shortcomings. Importantly, the legislation aligns with Michigan's existing civil rights framework by incorporating provisions that respond to complaints in a structured and equitable manner, thereby reinforcing civil rights protections across the state.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 383, known as the statewide equal language access coordination act, seeks to enhance equal language access to state services for individuals with limited English proficiency. This bill entails that the Office of Global Michigan will coordinate statewide efforts to ensure covered entities provide equal access to public services. The initiative aims to establish guidelines, designate personnel to facilitate compliance, and promote awareness of available language services among the public.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 383 appears to be largely supportive, with advocates highlighting its potential to improve statewide access to services for linguistic minorities. Proponents argue that enhancing language access is essential for inclusive governance, allowing non-English speakers to engage with state programs effectively. Nonetheless, there may be concerns about implementation costs and state agency readiness to meet the new requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the feasibility of coordinating language access procedures across various state entities and ensuring that the designated language access liaisons are adequately trained and resourced. Critics may argue about the bureaucratic implications of requiring comprehensive language services, particularly in areas where resources are already stretched thin. Balancing resource allocation while ensuring adherence to equitable access principles represents a challenging aspect of proposed implementation.