Michigan Senate Bill SB0512

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/19/23
• Refer: 9/19/23

Caption

School aid: penalties; school aid penalties for districts and intermediate districts; modify. Amends secs. 15 & 163 of 1979 PA 94 (MCL 388.1615 & 388.1763).

Impact

The amendments to the State School Aid Act are expected to enhance financial accountability for educational institutions by instituting stricter guidelines for aid allocation and recovery of overpayments. School districts are now required to monitor their financial allocations more closely and ensure compliance with certification regulations for employed educators. This shift is geared toward reducing financial discrepancies across educational institutions in Michigan, thereby ensuring that districts operate within their allocated budgets and adhere to certification standards for educators.

Summary

Senate Bill NO. 512 proposes amendments to the State School Aid Act of 1979, specifically targeting sections 15 and 163. This bill aims to clarify the processes surrounding the apportionment of school aid to districts and intermediate districts. It necessitates that if a district fails to receive its due aid apportionment, the department must allocate the deficiency in the next payment once proof of the rightful claim is established. Conversely, if a district is found to have received an excess payment, corrections need to be made promptly against future apportionments. The bill also highlights the financial recovery options available for state aid overpayments made to school districts, specifically excluding special education payments from these provisions.

Contention

A notable aspect of SB 512 is its focus on employment regulations for educators. The bill introduces significant penalties for school officials who knowingly employ individuals without proper certification, imposing a financial deduction for periods of such employment. This provision aims to uphold educational standards but may face opposition from districts that argue such financial penalties could further strain already tight budgets. Additionally, there is concern regarding the flexibility or lack of buffer for districts affected by unforeseen circumstances, such as natural disasters, which might hinder compliance with the employment regulations.