Natural resources: hunting; deer baiting license; provide for. Amends secs. 40102 & 40111a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.40102 & 324.40111a).
Impact
If passed, SB 612 would create a structured process for the Michigan Department of Natural Resources to regulate deer and elk baiting practices, fostering a more defined approach to wildlife management. The implementation of a licensing system for baiting activities is expected to generate revenue and better manage the ecological impact of feeding practices. Further, the bill’s provisions allow for the state agency to restrict these practices in areas with detected wildlife diseases, aiming to prevent the spread of such diseases among vulnerable animal populations. Overall, this legislative measure aims to balance wildlife conservation efforts with the interests of hunters and the public.
Summary
Senate Bill 612 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (1994 PA 451) by specifically addressing the practices of deer and elk baiting and feeding in the state of Michigan. The bill introduces clarity on the definitions of baiting and feeding practices, establishing regulations around the deposition and distribution of feed in areas frequented by wild, free-ranging deer or elk. It requires individuals who engage in deer or elk baiting on private property to purchase a deer baiting license, with fees structured for both residents and non-residents. The amendment also allows for the possibility of issuing restrictions or bans on baiting in certain areas identified with chronic wasting disease cases, to protect public resources and wildlife health.
Contention
Debate surrounding SB 612 highlights concerns among various stakeholders including environmentalists, hunting associations, and local communities. Supporters argue that the bill is essential for maintaining wildlife health and managing deer populations, especially in light of the increasing concerns over chronic wasting disease. However, critics express worries that regulation might infringe upon traditional hunting practices and limit recreational opportunities for hunters. The nuances of defining acceptable feeding and baiting practices have also sparked discussions about the enforcement and effectiveness of such regulations, particularly regarding implementation and potential impacts on local wildlife behavior.
Natural resources: hunting; penalties for failure to report a deer harvest or taking of deer over feeding or baiting; modify. Amends sec. 40118 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.40118).
Natural resources: hunting; penalty for failing to report a deer harvest or retain a deer harvest confirmation number; modify. Amends sec. 40118 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.40118).