Michigan Senate Bill SB0829

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/16/24
• Refer: 4/16/24
• Report Pass: 6/18/24
• Refer: 6/18/24
• Report Pass: 6/25/24
• Engrossed: 6/26/24
• Refer: 6/26/24
• Report Pass: 11/14/24

Caption

Criminal procedure: sentencing guidelines; reference to section of the Michigan occupational safety and health act; amend to reflect repeal. Amends sec. 14b, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.14b). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0830'24

Impact

If enacted, SB 829 will directly influence the legal expectations surrounding occupational safety practices in Michigan. It will clarify the legal penalties associated with violations of occupational health standards, especially in scenarios resulting in serious consequences such as employee fatalities. As a tie bar with Senate Bill No. 830 implies, the enactment of this bill may necessarily depend on the passage of related legislation, indicating a carefully coordinated approach to workplace safety legislation in Michigan.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 829 seeks to amend the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure, particularly regarding sentencing guidelines that refer to violations under the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act (MIOSHA). The bill's primary objective is to update the legal framework concerning the consequences of certain employee safety violations, specifically those leading to death. By doing so, the state aims to underscore its commitment to maintaining high safety standards in both industrial and employment contexts, thereby attempting to reduce workplace injuries and fatalities.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding SB 829 is cautiously optimistic among those advocating for workplace safety and employee protection. Supporters perceive the amendment as a necessary step toward enhancing accountability among employers. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about potential unintended consequences that could arise from stricter guidelines, which they argue might place an undue burden on businesses while seeking compliance.

Contention

Notable points of contention have emerged from the discussions related to SB 829, particularly regarding how the proposed amendments interact with existing laws and the broader implications for businesses. Critics express apprehension regarding the potential for increased litigation and the burden on small businesses, arguing that the amendments could create a chilling effect on employer-employee relations. These competing perspectives reveal an ongoing debate about how best to balance the need for employee safety with the operational realities faced by employers in Michigan.