Michigan Senate Bill SB1067

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/7/24
• Refer: 11/7/24
• Report Pass: 12/13/24
• Engrossed: 12/13/24
• Refer: 12/13/24

Caption

Civil procedure: costs and fees; fee for publication of legal notice; remove sunset for inflation adjustment. Amends sec. 2534 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.2534).

Impact

The proposed changes through SB1067 are significant as they remove the sunset provision that was previously set for 2025 regarding inflation adjustments to the publication rates. Instead, the Department of Treasury is directed to make annual adjustments to these costs based on the percentage increase in the U.S. Consumer Price Index from March 1, 2018, onward. This ongoing adjustment is intended to keep the costs aligned with inflation, ensuring that the fees charged by newspapers are equitable and reflective of the economic environment. Such a change may also impact the financial viability of smaller publications in terms of covering operating costs associated with legal notices.

Summary

Senate Bill 1067 aims to amend the Revised Judicature Act of 1961 by modifying the regulations regarding the publishing costs for legal notices in newspapers. The bill proposes a maximum charge for the first publication of legal notices to be set at $20.50 per folio, with subsequent publications costing $8.45 each. Additionally, the bill establishes minimum costs for publishing notices based on their frequency, which is set to $44.00 for one-time publications and $59.00 for those published twice or more. This amendment not only updates the reimbursement structure but also seeks to adjust these costs based on inflation.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB1067 appears to be supportive among stakeholders who advocate for a consistent approach to adjusting publication costs in line with inflation. Supporters argue that it prevents potential financial losses for newspapers and ensures that the public can access essential legal notices without significant barriers. However, concerns were raised about the potential impact on smaller newspapers that may struggle to compete with larger publications, particularly if they rely heavily on fees from legal notices as a revenue stream.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the balance between ensuring that the cost of publishing legal notices remains accessible to the public while also allowing newspapers to sustain their operations. Critics of the current fee structure cited disparities that could potentially disadvantage smaller newspapers. Lawmakers discussed whether the proposed adjustments would effectively cater to diverse communities and their media needs, ensuring that everyone has access to necessary legal information. This debate highlights an ongoing tension between regulatory frameworks and the need for local media to thrive within their respective markets.