Michigan Senate Bill SB1131

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 11/14/24
• Refer: 11/14/24
• Report Pass: 12/18/24
• Refer: 12/18/24

Caption

Environmental protection: air pollution; regulation of carbon sequestration; provide for. Amends sec. 1301 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.1301) & adds subch. 6 to ch. 3, art. III. TIE BAR WITH: SB 1132'24, SB 1133'24

Impact

The bill significantly amends existing provisions by introducing a specific section dedicated to carbon sequestration activities that will impact state regulations concerning environmental protection. It not only outlines the procedures for permit applications but also assigns accountability for environmental performance to the state, which assumes liability for any associated risks once a permit is granted. The bill creates a carbon sequestration fund to manage revenues from fees imposed on operators based on the volume of carbon dioxide injected, which can be utilized for monitoring activities and regulatory compliance.

Summary

Senate Bill 1131, amending the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act of 1994, focuses primarily on the regulation of carbon sequestration projects in Michigan. This legislation establishes a framework for developing a permitting process for projects designed to inject and store carbon dioxide in geological formations. It integrates definitions and operational protocols for entities seeking permits, delineating the responsibilities and liabilities of both the state and project operators. The aim is to ensure that carbon sequestration is conducted safely and with minimal environmental risks, ultimately assisting the state's climate goals.

Contention

There are multiple points of contention surrounding SB1131. Stakeholders in the energy and environmental sectors have raised concerns about the scope of authority granted to the state in permitting and oversight. Critics argue that the bill may restrict local entities from exerting control over land use decisions related to carbon injection projects. Additionally, there may be issues regarding the transparency of the permit process, particularly concerning public hearings and community involvement. These tensions highlight the need for balancing statewide climate initiatives with local environmental priorities.