Michigan House Bill HB4642

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/12/25
• Refer: 6/12/25

Caption

Campaign finance: violations; authority of the attorney general's office to resolve violations involving the secretary of state; provide for. Amends sec. 15 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.215).

Impact

If enacted, HB4642 will provide the office of the attorney general with stronger enforcement capabilities against campaign finance violations. It establishes guidelines for civil penalties that may be imposed for violations, which can be up to $1,000 per infraction. Additionally, the bill enables the secretary of state to issue various forms and instruction manuals and develop a filing system that will help facilitate compliance amongst candidates and campaign committees. This enhancement aims to promote transparency and accountability in campaign financing in Michigan.

Summary

House Bill 4642 aims to amend the Michigan Campaign Finance Act of 1976 to clarify the enforcement powers of the attorney general concerning violations involving the secretary of state. The bill specifically outlines procedures for handling complaints related to campaign finance violations, enhancing the authority of the secretary of state in managing such matters. The proposed changes include the establishment of a clearer framework for filing complaints, responses, and the stipulated timelines for various processes associated with these complaints. This ensures that complaints can be efficiently managed and tracked throughout the enforcement process.

Contention

Notably, the bill has faced scrutiny over concerns regarding the potential overreach of regulatory powers by the state, particularly regarding the authority provided to the attorney general in handling civil offenses. The requirement for compliance with strict procedural timelines, along with possible civil liabilities for complaints deemed false, raises questions about the balance between enforcement and the rights of individuals or entities to question alleged violations. As such, discussions around this bill center on finding a middle ground between effective enforcement of campaign finance laws and protecting the rights of accused parties.