Michigan House Bill HB4784

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 8/21/25
• Refer: 8/21/25

Caption

Natural resources: other; authority to make certain decisions regarding game in the Upper Peninsula; grant to the Upper Peninsula natural resources commission. Amends secs. 40110, 40110a, 40110b & 40113a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.40110 et seq.). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4785'25, HB 4786'25, HB 4783'25

Impact

If enacted, HB 4784 would centralize the authority of game management in Michigan within the legislature and the UP commission. This consolidation of authority is intended to ensure that decisions regarding wildlife populations are managed according to the principles of sound scientific management. The bill emphasizes the cultural and economic significance of hunting, fishing, and wildlife conservation for Michigan, framing these activities as critical to the identity and economy of the state.

Summary

House Bill 4784 seeks to amend specific sections of the 1994 PA 451, known as the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, particularly concerning the designation of wildlife species and the authority over hunting regulations in Michigan. The bill reaffirms that only the legislature, the Upper Peninsula (UP) commission, or designated authorities can classify a species as game and set the first open season for hunting such species. Moreover, it specifically outlines provisions for species including wolves and moose, reflecting the state's ongoing commitment to wildlife management and conservation objectives.

Contention

There may be potential disputes surrounding this bill, particularly concerning the balance of power between state and local management of wildlife. Supporters argue that this will lead to better and more uniform management practices, while critics may view it as a limitation on local governance and a one-size-fits-all approach to diverse ecological needs across the state. Notably, the provision to establish hunting seasons for previously protected species like wolves could provoke strong reactions from conservation groups and animal welfare advocates, who might oppose the re-establishment of hunting as a management strategy.

Additional_notes

The bill is tied to several other legislative proposals and will not take effect unless related bills are also passed. This connection could influence discussions and negotiations as stakeholders weigh the broader implications of these interconnected legislative efforts.