State finance: budgets; limits for state spending; provide for, and provide for taxpayer refunds. Amends sec. 28, art. IX of the state constitution.
Impact
The proposed amendment could significantly influence state fiscal policies by introducing stricter limitations on how funds are managed. It mandates that any revenue collected in excess of the set limits be returned to citizens, which may lead to a shift in how surplus funds are allocated. This aspect intends to enhance transparency and accountability in state spending which, if passed, could resonate with constituents advocating for more equitable financial practices.
Summary
HJRJ proposes an amendment to the Michigan state constitution that seeks to modify the limits on state spending. This amendment aims to establish a formula for determining how much the state legislature can spend each fiscal year. Specifically, it stipulates that state spending cannot exceed either the total revenue limit or be calculated as the previous fiscal year's base adjusted for inflation and population growth. This reform positions the state to be more fiscally conservative by ensuring a formulaic approach to spending limits.
Conclusion
Ultimately, HJRJ aims to clarify spending procedures and uphold fiscal constraints within the state. The bill's significance lies in its potential to reshape Michigan's budgeting practices while also encouraging fiscal conservatism. If passed, the amendment will not only adjust the way state finances are governed but also necessitate continuous discussions on the broader implications for public welfare and state responsibilities.
Contention
Opinions surrounding HJRJ are likely to be diverse. Proponents may argue that these changes are necessary to prevent excessive government spending and to promote fiscal responsibility. Conversely, opponents could express concerns about the implications of such limitations on state-funded programs and services, particularly those requiring funding to address pressing societal needs. The debate may center around the need for flexibility in state budgeting to adapt to unforeseen circumstances while maintaining financial integrity.
State management: other; state financing of activities or services required of local units of government; provide for. Implements sec. 29, art. IX of the state constitution & repeals 1979 PA 101 (MCL 21.231 - 21.244).
Constitutional amendments: state; deadline for filing petitions to amend the state constitution; revise. Amends sec. 2, art. XII of the state constitution.
Constitutional amendments: state; requirement for individual to wear a face mask to enter certain facility; prohibit. Amends the state constitution by adding sec. 29 to art. I.
Legislature: apportionment; independent citizens redistricting commission; abolish. Amends sec. 1, art. IV, secs. 1, 2 & 4, art. V & secs. 1 & 4, art. VI; adds secs. 6a & 6b to art. IV & repeals sec. 6, art. IV of the state constitution.