Michigan Senate Bill SB0217

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/17/25
• Refer: 4/17/25
• Report Pass: 6/5/25
• Refer: 6/5/25

Caption

Traffic control: accidents; penalties for moving violation causing physical injury or death to a vulnerable roadway user; enhance. Amends sec. 12e, ch. XVII of 1927 PA 175 (MCL 777.12e). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0216'25

Impact

If enacted, SB0217 will impose stricter penalties on individuals who commit moving violations that severely injure or kill vulnerable users of the road. This includes maximum sentences that could range significantly based on the severity of the violation. For instance, moving violations that lead to the death of another person in a work zone could incur maximum prison sentences. By elevating the legal consequences for such offenses, the legislation aims to deter reckless driving and encourage safer driving practices in areas frequented by pedestrians and cyclists.

Summary

Senate Bill 217 (SB0217) aims to amend the Michigan Code of Criminal Procedure, specifically targeting penalties for moving violations that result in physical injuries or deaths to vulnerable roadway users, including pedestrians and cyclists. The proposed changes will enhance penalties for specific traffic violations, especially those that occur in high-risk zones such as work zones or school zones. This is part of a broader initiative to improve road safety and protect vulnerable users from traffic-related accidents. The bill is tied to Senate Bill 216, implying that it cannot take effect unless the latter is also enacted.

Conclusion

Overall, SB0217 represents a significant step towards improving traffic safety for vulnerable users on Michigan roads. By increasing the penalties associated with moving violations, the bill acknowledges the heightened risks that certain roadway users face and seeks to address these dangers through legislative means. As discussions continue, stakeholders will need to ensure that the bill's provisions are clear and enforceable to achieve its intended safety outcomes.

Contention

Despite the bill's intentions, there may be opposition concerning the degree of penalties imposed and the potential designation of certain individuals as 'vulnerable' users. Critics may argue that the definitions could lead to unintended consequences in enforcement, impacting the prosecution of drivers who may not have intended to cause harm. Additionally, concerns may arise regarding how these enhanced penalties would fit into the existing legal framework surrounding traffic violations, as well as how effectively they can be enforced without burdening the judicial system.