Michigan Senate Bill SB0563

Michigan 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 9/18/25
• Refer: 9/18/25

Caption

Aeronautics: other; aircraft registration fees; modify. Amends sec. 77 of 1945 PA 327 (MCL 259.77).

Impact

The amendments introduced by SB0563 will have significant implications for how aircraft are registered within the state. By establishing that the registration fee is paid annually and that it constitutes a replacement for all property taxes applicable to aircraft, the bill simplifies the fiscal responsibilities of aircraft owners. The fee structure based on the aircraft's weight (1 cent per pound) also indicates a move towards a more standardized approach in determining fees, potentially benefiting both the state in revenue collection and aircraft operators in making financial forecasts.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 563 proposes amendments to the existing Michigan Aeronautics Code, specifically addressing aircraft registration procedures and fees. The key change includes the introduction of a renewal registration application process sent by the commission to aircraft owners starting November 1 each year, prior to the designated registration year. This aims to streamline the registration process and ensure timely renewals, as owners will now have a clear timeline for registration application submissions. Additionally, the bill mandates that new aircraft owners inform the commission of their registration within a 30-day window upon the aircraft becoming subject to registration obligations.

Contention

Despite the bill's potential benefits, there may be contentions surrounding the penalties imposed for late registration. Aircraft owners who fail to register or pay the respective fees by the deadline will incur a $50 penalty for the first month overdue, with additional penalties accumulating thereafter. This creates concerns regarding the financial burden on those owners who may experience delays due to circumstances beyond their control. Moreover, there is room for discretion in waiver of penalties by the director of the state transportation department, which could lead to questions about uniformity and fairness in enforcement of these regulations.