Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF1130

Introduced
2/1/23  
Refer
2/1/23  

Caption

Cities authorized to adopt pesticide control ordinances.

Impact

If HF1130 is enacted, it will grant cities greater authority in managing pesticide applications within their jurisdictions. Cities can prohibit the use of specific pesticides identified as harmful to pollinators, thereby aiming to enhance local agricultural practices and environmental health. The bill stipulates that the Minnesota Department of Agriculture must maintain a list of these pollinator-lethal pesticides on its website, ensuring transparency and facilitating enforcement of local ordinances.

Summary

House File 1130 seeks to empower cities in Minnesota to enact local ordinances regarding pesticide control, specifically focusing on pollinator-lethal pesticides. The bill amends Minnesota Statutes to allow statutory and home rule charter cities to develop ordinances that can impose their own penalty and enforcement provisions concerning the application of certain pesticides. This legislative measure reflects a growing concern about the impact of pesticides on pollinator populations, particularly bees, which are crucial for various agricultural processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HF1130 appears to be generally positive among environmental advocates and agricultural reform groups who perceive this legislation as a necessary step towards protecting pollinator populations. However, there may be contention from agricultural sectors or businessmen who fear that such local regulations could impose additional burdens on pesticide use, potentially impacting agricultural productivity and economic viability.

Contention

One notable point of contention is the balance between local control and potential state regulatory mismatches. Advocates for the bill argue it empowers communities to take action that aligns with their ecological priorities, while opponents could argue that differing regulations across localities may lead to confusion and inconsistency for pesticide manufacturers and distributors. Furthermore, there are concerns about the implications for farmers who rely on certain pesticides for crop management, as varying local regulations could complicate compliance.

Companion Bills

MN SF608

Similar To Pesticide control ordinances adoption by cities authorization

Similar Bills

CA AB2491

School facilities: organic pesticides: pilot program.

CA AB2816

Pesticides: schoolsites: report.

CA AB1788

Pesticides: use of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides.

CA AB2422

Pesticides: use of anticoagulants.

CA SB1361

Pesticides: schoolsites.

CA AB363

Pesticides: neonicotinoids for nonagricultural use: reevaluation: control measures.

CA SB89

Glyphosate: prohibition on sale.

CA AB1440

Pesticide testing.