Minnesota Senate Bill SF1225

Minnesota 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/6/23

Caption

State Board of Investment investing in certain assets that exclude Minnesota-based energy or natural resources companies or Minnesota-based agricultural or livestock companies prohibition; divestment of these assets requirement; financial services discrimination prohibition

Impact

This legislation is significant as it seeks to reshape investment practices by curbing potential bias against certain sectors, particularly those fundamental to Minnesota's economy. In practice, this means that the state board must ensure its investment strategies are inclusive of local businesses, protecting them from exclusion due to compliance with external ratings or standards. The bill outlines a systematic approach for these changes, requiring a report on compliance, which enhances accountability and transparency in state investment practices.

Summary

SF1225 aims to prohibit the State Board of Investment from investing in assets that discriminate against Minnesota-based energy, natural resources, agricultural, or livestock companies. The bill mandates divestment from such assets to promote a more equitable investment approach, ensuring that local enterprises are not excluded based on their environmental, social, or governance ratings. The requirement for divestment is structured with specific timelines, dictating the removal of these assets from the state board's portfolio within stipulated periods, reinforcing a commitment to local industries.

Contention

Notably, the bill addresses concerns around discrimination in financial services. It prohibits financial institutions from refusing services based on a person's political affiliation or from utilizing subjective criteria like social credit scores. This could stimulate debate regarding the balance between ethical investment practices and the operational freedoms of financial institutions. Critics might argue that such measures could hinder financial choices, while supporters will argue that it safeguards Minnesota businesses from unfair exclusionary practices.