Minnesota 2025-2026 Regular Session

Minnesota House Bill HF1822

Introduced
3/3/25  

Caption

Commissioner of transportation prohibited from reducing travel lanes or constructing a boulevard or land bridge on marked Interstate Highway 94 between the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul.

Impact

HF1822 would result in a direct amendment to Minnesota Statutes, adding specific provisions to safeguard the travel lanes on one of the main thoroughfares between two of the state's largest cities. By prohibiting any redesign that could affect the current use of the highway for roadway travel, the bill seeks to protect users of Interstate Highway 94 from what is perceived as unnecessary modifications that could limit their commuting experience. The effective date stipulates that these changes take place immediately upon final enactment, emphasizing the urgency of maintaining current travel conditions.

Summary

House File 1822 aims to preserve transportation infrastructure specifically along Interstate Highway 94 between Minneapolis and St. Paul by preventing the state commissioner of transportation from reducing travel lanes or constructing alternate designs such as boulevards or land bridges. This legislation is positioned to maintain the highway's current state and flow, ensuring that vehicular travel is not hindered by upcoming changes in infrastructure design that may complicate or reduce travel capacity. The intent behind HF1822 is to mitigate concerns about potential congestion and accessibility in a heavily trafficked area.

Contention

While HF1822 presents a straightforward mandate regarding transportation infrastructure, it may attract dissent from urban planners and local government officials who advocate for adaptive urban designs that necessitate such changes. Concerns may rise around the bill curbing innovative solutions to traffic management and urban development, such as potential enhancements to pedestrian and cyclist access or sustainability efforts that may be proposed in the future. The focus on preserving existing travel lanes could ignore growing needs for multi-modal transportation solutions that accommodate varying forms of transit in urban settings.

Companion Bills

MN SF179

Similar To Interstate Highway 94 between Minneapolis and St. Paul lane reduction, boulevard or land bridge option prohibition

Previously Filed As

MN HF2270

Transportation; funding provided for feasibility study of highway-to-boulevard conversion of marked Interstate Highway 94, and money appropriated.

MN SF2180

Feasibility study of a highway-to-boulevard conversion of marked Interstate Highway 94 appropriation

MN SF1194

Interstate Highway 94 construction of additional lanes between Albertville and Monticello bond issue and appropriation

MN SF2884

Marked Interstate Highway 94 reconstruction appropriation between the cities of St, Joseph and Sauk Center

MN SF4867

City of Lakeville bridge interstate project on marked Interstate Highway 35 bond issuance and appropriation

MN HF891

Albertville and Monticello; marked Interstate Highway 94 segment additional lane construction funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

MN SF5304

Freeborn County replacement bridge on marked Trunk Highway 109 over marked Interstate Highway 90 bond issuance and appropriation

MN SF5305

Mower County bridge replacement on County State-Aid Highway 13 over marked Interstate Highway 90 bond issuance and appropriation

MN HF2887

Transportation finance and policy bill.

MN HF5290

Freeborn County; marked Trunk Highway 109 bridge over marked Interstate Highway 90 replacement funding provided, bonds issued, and money appropriated.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.