Missouri House Bill HB2169

Missouri 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/22
• Refer: 2/1/22
• Report Pass: 3/2/22
• Refer: 3/2/22
• Report Pass: 3/7/22

Caption

Establishes provisions for the appointment and duties of commissioners to attend an Article V convention

Impact

The implications of HB 2169 could significantly shape Missouri's role in the national dialogue about constitutional amendments. By clearly defining how the state will appoint its representatives to an Article V convention, the bill aims to ensure a structured approach that curtails unauthorized actions and maintains alignment with legislative intent. This structure is designed to uphold the integrity of Missouri's representation, providing a mechanism by which the general assembly can direct and oversee the actions of its appointed delegates. Additionally, the requirement for congressional district representation seeks to foster a broader representation of Missouri's diverse political landscape in any amendment considerations.

Summary

House Bill 2169 establishes provisions regarding the appointment and duties of commissioners who will represent Missouri at an Article V convention of the United States Constitution. Specifically, the bill outlines that Missouri will have a number of commissioners equal to its congressional districts, with each district represented by one commissioner and one alternate. These individuals are required to be citizens of Missouri and meet eligibility criteria similar to those necessary for holding office in the state legislature, excluding certain officials such as members of Congress and state officeholders. The selection of these commissioners will be governed by a process established by a joint legislative committee, ensuring that a portion of them are not current members of the general assembly.

Contention

While many may view HB 2169 as a necessary step towards organized representation at a constitutional convention, potential points of contention may arise regarding the limitations placed on who can serve as a commissioner, particularly the exclusion of elected officials for state-wide offices. Critics might argue that this could limit the inclusion of experienced individuals who are familiar with legislative processes. Furthermore, the bill includes measures to permit the legislative committee to recall commissioners for unauthorized votes, which could raise concerns about political maneuvering and the extent of legislative control over representatives. The balance between maintaining legislative oversight and allowing for independent representation will be a key debate surrounding this bill.