Modifies provisions relating to higher education tuition
HB2613 has significant implications for the accessibility of higher education for certain populations, particularly non-citizens in Missouri. By mandating that higher education institutions cannot deny admission solely based on immigration status, the bill seeks to foster inclusivity and ensure that students who meet educational criteria are not barred from pursuing higher education due to their immigration status. Additionally, privacy is emphasized, as any information collected through the admissions process must remain confidential, aiming to alleviate concerns regarding the disclosure of sensitive personal information.
House Bill 2613 aims to modify existing provisions related to higher education tuition in Missouri. The bill proposes to repeal sections 173.1110 and 208.009 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri and enact two new sections under the titles 174.820 and 208.009. The new provisions specifically address the criteria under which individuals are classified as Missouri residents for the purpose of tuition, fees, and admission to state-funded higher education institutions. The bill stipulates that individuals graduating from a Missouri high school, including private and home schools, will be deemed residents unless they establish a residence outside of Missouri. This is particularly relevant for individuals who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents, as they must provide written statements agreeing to regularize their immigration status upon eligibility.
Nevertheless, HB2613 has sparked debates centred around the provisions related to public benefits for individuals unlawfully present in the United States. The bill explicitly prohibits such individuals from accessing state or local public benefits, except for certain benefits as outlined by federal law. This aspect of the legislation raises concerns among advocacy groups who argue that it may not only disenfranchise vulnerable populations but also create barriers to essential services and support systems. Opponents fear that the stipulation could result in significant negative societal impacts, particularly concerning health and educational services.