Modifies provisions relating to elections
If enacted, SB654 would fundamentally reshape election administration in Missouri by introducing new sections that prioritize the use of paper ballots and streamline the process of mail-in voting. The law mandates that all ballots be printed on paper, with electronic systems only allowed to function alongside these paper ballots, marking a significant shift towards more tactile voting methods. The legislation also imposes new accountability measures on local election authorities, including audits of voter registration lists, aimed at maintaining the accuracy of registered voters.
Senate Bill 654 proposes extensive reforms to Missouri's election process, focusing primarily on voter registration, mail-in ballots, and electronic voting procedures. The bill seeks to repeal multiple existing statutes related to elections, replacing them with new guidelines designed to enhance the integrity and security of elections. Notably, it establishes provisions for stricter controls over mail-in voting, including requirements for ballot handling and the rejection of ballots deemed to involve unlawful assistance.
The sentiment surrounding SB654 is divided, with proponents emphasizing the need for electoral integrity and security amid public concerns regarding voting fraud. They argue that these regulations will help protect the democratic process. In contrast, opponents view the bill as overly restrictive, potentially disenfranchising eligible voters and complicating the voting process, particularly for those reliant on mail-in ballots. This contention highlights broader debates regarding voting access versus electoral security.
One notable point of contention in the discussions is the degree of impact SB654 could have on voter turnout, especially among vulnerable populations such as the elderly or disabled, who may find new requirements burdensome. Critics argue that increasing procedural barriers, such as demanding more stringent identification for mail-in ballots, could lead to lower participation rates. The requirement for voters utilizing closed residential addresses to verify their eligibility adds further scrutiny that some legislators believe is unnecessary.