Modifies provisions relating to settlement demands to liability insurers
Impact
The modification introduced by SB 466 would impose requirements on claimants when making settlement demands, such as providing a written demand sent through certified mail, including specific information regarding the injuries sustained, and keeping the offer open for a minimum of ninety days. These changes could lead to significant alterations in the landscape of personal injury law in Missouri, potentially affecting the negotiation dynamics between claimants and insurers, as well as the overall efficiency of resolution processes for such claims.
Summary
Senate Bill 466 aims to revise existing laws concerning the procedure and requirements for settlement demands made to liability insurers in cases involving personal injuries, bodily injuries, or wrongful death. The bill specifically seeks to define 'extracontractual damages' and establish criteria for what constitutes a reasonable opportunity for a liability insurer to settle a claim. By repealing the current section and enacting new provisions, SB 466 intends to create stricter guidelines for how settlement demands are handled by insurers, particularly in scenarios where claims involve amounts exceeding available policy limits.
Sentiment
Overall, the sentiment regarding SB 466 appears to be mixed. Proponents believe that the bill reinforces proper procedures and consistency in settlement demands, aiming to reduce the ambiguity that can lead to disagreements and disputes in tort claims. On the other hand, critics argue that the stringent requirements may disadvantage claimants and prolong settlement processes, potentially complicating an already difficult pathway for those seeking compensation for injuries.
Contention
Notable points of contention around SB 466 relate to concerns about the bill's impact on claimants' rights. Opponents contend that the increased formal requirements for settlement demands could limit access to justice for victims of personal and bodily injuries, as it may introduce additional hurdles in the legal process. They caution that the changes could disproportionately favor insurance companies by making it harder for claimants to assert their rights in negotiating settlements, thus raising questions about fairness in the tort system.
Modifies provisions relating to civil procedure, including the collateral source rule, time-limited settlement demands, references to damages, and disclosure requirements