Requires a state agency to repeal two existing rules before enacting a new one
Impact
If enacted, HB2197 would have a significant impact on the structure of administrative rules in Missouri. The new requirement would necessitate a careful review and consideration of existing rules before any new regulations can be implemented. This could lead to the elimination of outdated or unnecessary regulations, potentially simplifying compliance for individuals and businesses. However, it could also slow down the process of implementing new rules, as agencies may need to examine and repeal multiple rules before introducing new ones.
Summary
House Bill 2197 is a regulatory reform proposal that aims to streamline the process by which state agencies enact new rules. The bill requires that for a new rule to take effect, the proposing agency must first repeal at least two of its existing rules. This approach seeks to reduce the burden of regulations on individuals and businesses by limiting the total number of rules in effect at any given time. By controlling the proliferation of regulations, the bill intends to foster a more manageable regulatory environment within the state of Missouri.
Contention
One notable point of contention surrounding HB2197 revolves around the balance between regulation and deregulation. Proponents of the bill argue that it is essential for creating a leaner government that promotes economic growth by easing regulatory burdens. Conversely, critics fear that this requirement may unjustly hinder necessary regulations that protect public health, safety, and welfare. The concern is that the bill could create a situation where beneficial rules are repealed simply to satisfy the requirement for new rules, leading to potentially harmful gaps in regulatory oversight.
Requires any legislation originating in the House that adds a new requirement for public schools to include provisions that reduce an existing requirement for public schools