Missouri 2024 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB1066

Introduced
1/3/24  

Caption

Preempts certain local ordinances relating to employment law

Impact

The impact of SB1066 is anticipated to be far-reaching for workers and employers alike. Supporters argue that the bill will promote business growth by limiting the burden of complying with multiple local wage and benefit regulations, thereby attracting new businesses to the state. Conversely, critics express concern that the bill undermines local governance and diminishes the ability of communities to address their unique economic needs, particularly in areas where living costs may demand higher wages. Such preemptions effectively strip local authorities of their capacities to respond proactively to local employment conditions, which could adversely affect low-income workers seeking a livable wage.

Summary

Senate Bill 1066 introduces significant amendments to employment law by preemptively nullifying any local ordinances that exceed state regulations concerning minimum wage and employment benefits. The bill intends to centralize authority at the state level, thereby preventing political subdivisions from enacting policies that mandate higher minimum wages or additional employee benefits. This act is described in the bill as aiming to create uniformity across employment standards within the state, making it easier for employers to comply with a single set of regulations rather than adapting to varying local requirements.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB1066 lies in the balance between state and local authority. Proponents of the bill assert that it is a necessary step towards economic growth and regulatory clarity, arguing that differing local ordinances create confusion and instability for businesses. On the other hand, detractors criticize the bill as an overreach by the state government, arguing that local governments should have the autonomy to tailor employment standards according to the needs of their communities. As such, this bill has sparked a heated debate regarding the proper scope of state influence over local governance and the potential ramifications for worker rights and community specific needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB516

Sex offenses: disabled victims.

CA AB2123

District-based elections.

CA AB453

District-based elections.

MI HB4122

Health occupations: health professionals; permanent revocation of license or registration if convicted of sexual conduct under pretext of medical treatment; provide for. Amends sec. 16226 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.16226). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4121'23

CA AB3171

Controlled substances: fentanyl.

CA AB892

Sex offenders: registration: solicitation of a minor.

MN SF1826

Payment rates establishment for certain substance use disorder treatment services

MN HF1994

Payment rates established for certain substance use disorder treatment services, and vendor eligibility recodified for payments from the behavioral health fund.