| 1 | 1 | | |
|---|
| 2 | 2 | | EXPLANATION-Matter enclosed in bold-faced brackets [thus] in this bill is not enacted |
|---|
| 3 | 3 | | and is intended to be omitted in the law. |
|---|
| 4 | 4 | | FIRST REGULAR SESSION |
|---|
| 5 | 5 | | SENATE BILL NO. 600 |
|---|
| 6 | 6 | | 103RD GENERAL ASSEMBLY |
|---|
| 7 | 7 | | INTRODUCED BY SENATOR SCHNELTING. |
|---|
| 8 | 8 | | 2302S.01I KRISTINA MARTIN, Secretary |
|---|
| 9 | 9 | | AN ACT |
|---|
| 10 | 10 | | To repeal section 70.385, RSMo, relating to appointment of commissioners to the bi-state |
|---|
| 11 | 11 | | development agency. |
|---|
| 12 | 12 | | |
|---|
| 13 | 13 | | Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Missouri, as follows: |
|---|
| 14 | 14 | | Section A. Section 70.385, RSMo, is repealed, to read as 1 |
|---|
| 15 | 15 | | follows:2 |
|---|
| 16 | 16 | | [70.385. 1. Two of the five appointments 1 |
|---|
| 17 | 17 | | made by the governor pursuant to the provisions 2 |
|---|
| 18 | 18 | | of section 70.380 shall be selected from a panel 3 |
|---|
| 19 | 19 | | of three nominees submitted by the mayor of St. 4 |
|---|
| 20 | 20 | | Louis City. Two of the five appointments made 5 |
|---|
| 21 | 21 | | by the governor pursuant to the provisions of 6 |
|---|
| 22 | 22 | | section 70.380 shall be selected from a panel of 7 |
|---|
| 23 | 23 | | three nominees submitted by the county executive 8 |
|---|
| 24 | 24 | | of St. Louis County. 9 |
|---|
| 25 | 25 | | 2. The fifth appointment made by the 10 |
|---|
| 26 | 26 | | governor pursuant to section 70.380 shall be 11 |
|---|
| 27 | 27 | | selected from a panel of three nominees 12 |
|---|
| 28 | 28 | | submitted alternately by the mayor of St. Louis 13 |
|---|
| 29 | 29 | | City and the county executive of St. Louis 14 |
|---|
| 30 | 30 | | County. The next appointment following August 15 |
|---|
| 31 | 31 | | 28, 1997, shall be to fill the commissioner 16 |
|---|
| 32 | 32 | | position described in this subsection and shall 17 |
|---|
| 33 | 33 | | be made from three nominees submitted by the 18 |
|---|
| 34 | 34 | | county executive of St. Louis County. The next 19 |
|---|
| 35 | 35 | | appointment for the commissioner position 20 |
|---|
| 36 | 36 | | described in this subsection shall be made from 21 |
|---|
| 37 | 37 | | three nominees submitted by the mayor of St. 22 |
|---|
| 38 | 38 | | Louis City whereupon the order of nomination and 23 |
|---|
| 39 | 39 | | appointment for this position will repeat itself. 24 SB 600 2 |
|---|
| 40 | 40 | | 3. The order of the appointments made 25 |
|---|
| 41 | 41 | | pursuant to subsection 1 of this section shall 26 |
|---|
| 42 | 42 | | be as follows: 27 |
|---|
| 43 | 43 | | (1) One from the panel of nominees 28 |
|---|
| 44 | 44 | | submitted by the mayor of St. Louis city; 29 |
|---|
| 45 | 45 | | (2) One from the panel of nominees 30 |
|---|
| 46 | 46 | | submitted by the county executive of St. Louis 31 |
|---|
| 47 | 47 | | County whereupon the order of such appointments 32 |
|---|
| 48 | 48 | | shall repeat itself. 33 |
|---|
| 49 | 49 | | 4. Whenever the mayor or the county 34 |
|---|
| 50 | 50 | | executive submits a panel of three nominees, 35 |
|---|
| 51 | 51 | | they shall adhere to the intent set forth in the 36 |
|---|
| 52 | 52 | | provisions of subsection 2 of section 213.020. ] 37 |
|---|
| 53 | 53 | | |
|---|