Missouri 2025 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB83

Introduced
1/8/25  

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to child protection

Impact

The bill significantly impacts state laws regarding tax credits and funding for child protection services. It establishes a framework for taxpayers to receive a financial incentive for contributing to organizations that play critical roles in protecting the welfare and rights of children. By repealing outdated provisions, SB83 aims to streamline and modernize the tax credit application process while also increasing the annual limits on cumulative tax credits. This could potentially result in increased donations to child advocacy agencies, ultimately improving the outcomes for vulnerable children in the state.

Summary

Senate Bill 83 aims to modify provisions relating to child protection in the state of Missouri. Specifically, the bill introduces a tax credit known as the 'champion for children tax credit' that allows taxpayers to claim a percentage of contributions made to qualified agencies that provide services to children in need, including child advocacy centers and crisis care centers. The structured approach to tax credits is designed to incentivize community investments into child protection services, thereby enhancing the capacity and resources available to these vital organizations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB83 appears to be generally positive, particularly among those advocating for child welfare and protection services. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of empowering local agencies that work at the forefront of child advocacy, positioning them to more effectively address the challenges faced by children in crisis situations. However, some concerns have been raised regarding the sustainability of the funding model if contributions do not meet expectations or if the tax credits diminish the state's tax revenue.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the potential effectiveness of the tax credit system in generating sufficient funds for child advocacy services. Critics suggest that without adequate public funding, reliance on tax credits could leave organizations vulnerable to fluctuations in private donations, making it critical to establish a stable, ongoing funding source for child protection programs. Also, there are discussions about how well the bill’s proposed changes align with existing state efforts to safeguard children's rights and welfare.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

KS SB106

Permitting homeless veterans to use alternative forms of proof of identity and residency when applying for nondriver identification cards and eliminating fees for homeless veterans to obtain birth certificates for purposes of nondriver identification card applications.

KS SB508

Permitting homeless veterans to use alternative forms of proof of identity and residency when applying for nondriver identification cards and eliminating fees for homeless veterans to obtain birth certificates and nondriver identification cards.

KS HB2274

Removing the active requirement from military servicemembers for occupational licensure.

KS HB2512

Substitute for HB 2512 by Committee on Elections - Relating to advance voting ballots; requiring county election officers to provide at least four hours of advance voting in-person on the Saturday before an election; providing after January 1, 2025, such ballots cast in-person be received in the county election office by 7:00 p.m. on the Sunday proceeding the election; exception to allow voting in-person until 12:00 noon on Monday for good cause.

KS SB116

House Substitute for SB 116 by Committee on Federal and State Affairs - Removing state agency fees for licenses to carry concealed handguns.

KS SB250

Removing state department fees for concealed-carry licenses.

KS HB2412

Removing state agency fees for concealed-carry licenses.

KS SB7

Authorizing federally licensed firearm dealers, in addition to county sheriffs, to receive applications for concealed carry licenses and forward such applications to the attorney general, prohibiting sheriffs from assessing any fee related to application services and allowing dealers to assess a fee related to application services not to exceed $20.