Missouri 2023 Regular Session

Missouri Senate Bill SB47

Introduced
1/4/23  
Refer
1/12/23  
Engrossed
2/23/23  
Refer
3/28/23  
Report Pass
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  

Caption

Modifies provisions relating to fees collected by the Department of Revenue

Impact

The modifications introduced by SB 47 could have significant implications for state law concerning fee assessments and collections. By adjusting the fee structure, the bill intends to mitigate any discrepancies that may exist between the costs of administering revenue collection and the fees currently charged. This could potentially enhance the Department of Revenue's operational efficiency while also maximizing state revenue without imposing additional financial burdens on taxpayers.

Summary

Senate Bill 47 proposes to modify existing provisions related to the fees collected by the Department of Revenue. This bill aims to streamline the fee structure and ensure that it aligns more closely with current economic conditions and administrative costs associated with revenue collection activities. Supporters of the bill argue that these changes will lead to a more efficient system that can better serve both the state and its citizens by modernizing the revenue collection process.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 47 is generally positive among its proponents, who view it as a necessary step toward financial efficiency. However, there are concerns among some stakeholders about the potential implications of the fee changes on small businesses and individuals. While supporters emphasize the need for modernization, critics caution against the risk of increased financial obligations for certain demographics, raising concerns about equitable access to revenue services.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding SB 47 revolve around the specifics of the fee modifications and their potential economic impact. Some legislators are worried that changes to the fee structure might disproportionately affect low-income individuals and small enterprises. The debate reflects broader discussions on tax policy and state funding, where proponents assert the need for reform while opponents highlight the need for safeguards to prevent adverse effects on vulnerable populations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.