Intestate succession; child conceived by assisted reproduction after decedent's death is deemed to be living at time of death.
By incorporating this provision into the intestate succession statutes, HB996 expands the definition of 'living children' to include those conceived after a decedent's death under certain conditions. The bill further stipulates that there must be documented intent from the decedent regarding the use of genetic material for reproduction. If passed, it modifies the traditional understanding of inheritance, ensuring that children who are born as a result of artificial reproductive methods are not excluded from inheritance rights due to the timing of their conception relative to their parent's death.
House Bill 996 seeks to amend the Mississippi Code regarding intestate succession laws, specifically addressing situations involving assisted reproduction. With this bill, if a decedent dies before the conception of a child through assisted reproduction, and that child survives at least 120 hours post-birth, that child is recognized as living for the purposes of inheritance. This adjustment is intended to provide clarity and establish a legal basis for the rights of children conceived through assisted reproductive technologies in cases where the biological parent is deceased before birth.
General sentiment towards HB996 appears to be supportive among legislators emphasizing the importance of modern family structures and reproductive rights. Advocates argue that the bill reflects contemporary societal norms and protects the interests of children conceived via assisted reproduction. However, there may be concerns about the implications of requiring documented intentions from deceased individuals, raising questions about the complexities it could introduce into already challenging probate situations.
Notable points of contention center around the definitions and conditions set forth in the bill, particularly regarding the rebuttable presumption that a decedent did not intend for assisted reproduction if they were divorced or legally separated from the individual seeking to conceive. Critics could raise issues related to enforcement and interpretation of the bill’s provisions, as well as potential conflicts with existing familial arrangements. Additionally, some might question whether stipulating such conditions could unintentionally hinder the rights of children conceived through these means.