Intestate succession; child conceived by assisted reproduction after decedent's death is deemed to be living at the time of death.
The enactment of HB1542 will significantly impact Mississippi's laws governing intestate succession, particularly as they relate to children conceived through methods like in vitro fertilization or gamete donation. By clarifying the legal status of children born posthumously, the bill ensures these individuals have a claim to a child's share of the deceased's personal property. It also requires the decedent to have provided consent for the use of their genetic material in assisted reproduction, ensuring legal safeguards for families navigating these complex issues.
House Bill 1542, known as the Chris McDill Law, addresses the classification of individuals conceived through assisted reproductive technology when a decedent passes away. Specifically, it stipulates that if a person dies before the start of a pregnancy via assisted reproduction and the resulting child lives for at least 120 hours after birth, that child is treated as being alive at the time of the decedent's death. This law modifies existing statutes to accommodate the recognition of such children in matters of intestate succession.
The sentiment towards HB1542 appears generally positive, particularly among advocates for reproductive rights and families using assisted reproductive technologies. Supporters appreciate the bill's recognition of the realities of modern family structures and the need to update legal frameworks to reflect them. However, there may be some concerns around the implications of determining consent, especially in situations involving past relationships or legal separations.
Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the prerequisites for determining a child's legal standing as living at the time of a decedent's death. The stipulation that a consent record must exist between the deceased and the individual utilizing their genetic material could lead to legal challenges, particularly in cases that involve ambiguities about the decedent's intentions or family dynamics at the time of death. Additionally, the implications for federal benefits eligibility for these individuals could raise legal questions that might necessitate further legislative refinement.