Statehood to the people of Washington, D.C.; urge Congress to enact legislation that grants.
This resolution emphasizes that residents of Washington, D.C. should have parity with other citizens who reside in the states—specifically, they deserve representation in Congress with the right to vote for their elected officials. The resolution notes that D.C.'s population is comparable to those of several smaller states, and thus, it is argued that D.C. should similarly possess the rights associated with statehood, including representation through two Senators and at least one House member. This change would amend the political landscape and address ongoing debates over the rights and treatment of D.C. residents.
House Concurrent Resolution 36 calls upon the United States Congress to enact legislation to grant statehood to the residents of Washington, D.C. The resolution highlights the deep-rooted historical context where residents of the District were initially granted rights for representation, only to later face restrictions that stripped them of voting power in Congress. It points to significant points in history, including the passage of the Twentythird Amendment, as pivotal moments that led to the current disenfranchised status of D.C. residents despite their contributions to the nation including military service and paying higher federal taxes than residents of many states.
Opposition to this proposed statehood often stems from political arguments surrounding the balance of power in Congress and concerns that granting statehood to D.C. would provide a significant number of Democratic lawmakers, given the demographic makeup of the district. Detractors suggest that this could upset existing political alignments and lead to a growing influence of certain political ideologies. The resolution underscores the frustration felt by D.C. residents regarding their current lack of representation and equality, asserting that their disenfranchisement is a violation of democratic principles.