Charter schools; set certain school accreditation rating requirements for renewal of charter.
Impact
The proposed changes brought forth by SB2690 are expected to have a considerable influence on how charter schools calculate funding in the state. Previously based on average daily membership, the bill transitions to a model based on average daily attendance, which could result in fluctuating funding tied directly to student presence. This approach is designed to provide a more accurate reflection of enrollment and actual attendance, potentially offering more dynamic funding in response to actual classroom utilization.
Summary
Senate Bill 2690, titled as a significant amendment to the Mississippi Code, focuses on the governance and funding structure of charter schools in Mississippi. The bill seeks to repeal the provision that allowed charter school authorizers to receive a percentage of annual per-pupil allocations, thus shifting the funding model. Instead, it introduces the potential for specific appropriations made by the legislature to fund the authorizers directly, thereby restructuring the relationship between the state and charter schools regarding financial oversight and support.
Sentiment
Responses to SB2690 are mixed among stakeholders in education. Proponents argue that the bill addresses discrepancies in funding allocation and ensures the viability of charter schools financially, which are increasingly being viewed as pivotal to expanding education options for families. Conversely, opponents express concern that the deletion of the per-pupil allocation for authorizers may hinder necessary oversight and support for charter schools, potentially compromising educational quality and accountability.
Contention
Key areas of contention regarding SB2690 include the implications for authorizers and how funding changes affect their operational capabilities. Critics argue that reduced funding channels might lead to inadequate oversight of charter schools, undermining the educational integrity of the charter system. Additionally, the focus on average daily attendance rather than membership could disadvantage schools in terms of budget stability during transitions in enrollment, drawing concerns from educators about the stability of these institutions.