If enacted, HJ32 would require the establishment of a thorough analysis of existing water storage infrastructures, their capacities, and the potential for future enhancements. The study would assess engineering conditions, maintenance operations, and the impact of water storage systems on aquatic resources, especially in terms of drought resilience and evaporation management. This comprehensive analysis could lead to significant improvements in how Montana utilizes its available water resources, essential for meeting both current and future demands.
Summary
House Joint Resolution 32 (HJ32) proposes an interim study to evaluate the feasibility of developing surface and groundwater storage in Montana. The resolution emphasizes the importance of enhancing water storage capabilities, considering Montana's status as a headwaters state. The study aims to explore how engineered and natural water storage solutions can help address water supply challenges and support agricultural production, food security, and municipal water needs.
Contention
One notable area for potential contention revolves around the balance between developing new water rights and protecting existing ones. Stakeholders may express differing opinions regarding the prioritization of engineered solutions versus natural approaches to water management. The implications of the findings could prompt debates among legislators, local governments, and agricultural communities, particularly concerning resource allocation and environmental impacts associated with increasing water storage capacity.