Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB130

Introduced
1/7/25  
Refer
1/8/25  
Engrossed
1/29/25  
Refer
2/18/25  
Enrolled
4/9/25  

Caption

Revise state wildland fire policy and funding

Impact

In terms of legal implications, HB 130 modifies existing statutes regarding wildfire management, particularly those articulated in Section 76-13-115 of the Montana Code Annotated. By authorizing the state to bill federal entities, the bill creates a financial framework for managing suppression costs, which could alleviate the fiscal burden on state or county budgets. The legislation aims to reinforce interagency cooperation, ensuring that all entities involved in fire management—whether state, local, or federal—are accountable for their roles in fire prevention and suppression.

Summary

House Bill 130 seeks to revise state fire policy by clarifying the responsibilities of state and local fire protection entities. This includes establishing that the state has the authority to bill federal fire protection agencies for costs incurred during fire suppression efforts. The bill emphasizes the importance of minimizing property loss and safeguarding public safety, particularly as it relates to the management of wildfires within Montana's extensive landscapes. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens the state's capacity to respond to wildfires efficiently and ensures proper funding for these efforts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 130 appears to be generally positive among lawmakers, as evidenced by its strong support during legislative sessions, culminating in a significant majority vote. Legislators express a shared concern for public safety and environmental integrity, indicating a broader consensus on the necessity of robust wildfire policies. There may, however, be lingering apprehensions regarding the specific mechanisms of billing federal agencies, which could lead to some debate among various stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the implementation of billing practices and the potential for disputes between state and federal agencies over costs incurred during fire suppression. Critics of similar legislative measures might also raise concerns about local jurisdictions' autonomy in managing fire protection efforts and accountability in broader disaster management policies. The bill's immediate effective date further underscores the urgency that lawmakers feel regarding wildfire preparedness and response measures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.