Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB369

Introduced
1/31/25  

Caption

Create a county road maintenance district

Impact

If passed, the legislation would mandate that the county not only create such districts but also fund their operations through assessments levied on the benefited properties. The bill necessitates that a detailed maintenance plan be presented to the board, thus introducing a structured approach toward managing county road maintenance. This could have a significant influence on how local governments approach road management and funding, possibly alleviating issues related to declining road conditions in rural areas.

Summary

House Bill 369 seeks to establish a framework for creating county road maintenance districts within Montana. The bill requires that if a board of county commissioners decides to cease road maintenance on roads owned by entities other than the county, they must create a county road maintenance district upon receiving a petition from at least 66% of the property owners in the proposed area. This initiative is aimed at ensuring proper maintenance of roads that may otherwise fall into disrepair due to lack of county resources or oversight, addressing the infrastructure needs of local communities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding HB 369 appears to be supportive among those who recognize the necessity of maintaining rural infrastructure. Advocates argue that it fills a crucial gap left by county governments that may be unable or unwilling to manage road maintenance adequately. However, there are concerns about the financial implications for property owners who may face increased taxes or assessments to support these districts, leading to some apprehension among constituents about their potential financial burden.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the governance and funding mechanisms established by the bill. While proponents appreciate the introduction of viable maintenance solutions, skeptics might argue that it shifts excessive financial responsibility onto property owners within the districts. Community feedback during public hearings may reflect varying opinions about the necessity of such a district, the appropriateness of the proposed funding model, and the overall effectiveness of state versus local management of road maintenance and infrastructure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

MT SB117

Revise government entity limitations on property tax increases

MT SB102

Revise calculation of state education levies

LA HB97

Creates an economic development district in the city of Jeanerette

MT SB2

Revise treatment of tax increment upon expiration of tax increment financing provision

MT SB351

Limit the state's ability to bank statewide mills

MT HB20

Require voted levies to be in dollars rather than mills

LA HB107

Creates an economic development district in the city of St. Martinville

MT HB865

Revise government entity limitations on property tax increases