Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB376

Introduced
1/31/25  
Refer
2/3/25  

Caption

Require state agencies to provide timely information to legislators

Impact

If enacted, HB 376 would significantly amend existing healthcare laws by introducing stricter regulations on insurance practices, thereby enhancing consumer protections within the healthcare system. The bill would facilitate easier access to information regarding health insurance plans, coverage limitations, and out-of-pocket expenses, which proponents believe will empower patients in their healthcare decisions. Additionally, it aims to address gaps in patient care services, particularly for underserved populations who may struggle with navigating complex insurance claims.

Summary

House Bill 376 introduces new measures aimed at expanding healthcare access for patients across the state. The bill seeks to enhance the rights of patients with regards to their interactions with healthcare providers and insurers. Central to the bill is the provision that mandates transparency in medical billing and greater accountability for insurance companies in their coverage decisions. Proponents argue that this legislation is crucial for ensuring that patients are well-informed about their rights and the costs associated with their medical treatments.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 376 appears largely favorable among healthcare advocates and patient rights organizations, who view it as a necessary reform to rectify shortcomings in current healthcare laws. However, there exists opposition from certain insurance industry groups who argue that the bill could lead to increased operational costs for insurers, potentially driving up premiums for all consumers. The discussions in committee meetings reflect a mix of support from those prioritizing patient advocacy and apprehension from those concerned about fiscal implications.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding HB 376 include debates over the balance between consumer protections and the operational flexibility of insurance companies. Critics assert that while the intent to enhance patient rights is commendable, the practical implications of strict regulations could disrupt the delicate balance of the healthcare market. Furthermore, there are concerns about the specific provisions regarding billing transparency, which some argue could lead to unintended consequences such as increased administrative workload for healthcare providers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ AR96

Changes membership of Budget and Labor Committees; clarifies that bill or resolution may be listed on committee agenda for purposes of amendment.

MI HB4870

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; funds donated to a candidate for recall efforts; require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MI HB4326

Campaign finance: contributions and expenditures; provision related to officeholders raising funds when facing a recall; modify, and require candidate to establish a separate account used for recall purposes. Amends secs. 3, 11, 12, 21, 24 & 52 of 1976 PA 388 (MCL 169.203 et seq.) & adds sec. 21b.

MN HC6

A concurrent resolution recognizing wild rice as sacred and central to the culture and health of Indigenous Peoples in Minnesota and critical to the health and identity of all Minnesota citizens and ecosystems and establishing a commitment to passing legislation to protect wild rice and the freshwater resources upon which it depends.

CA SB602

Advisory bodies.

CA SB1048

Advisory bodies.

CA AB3239

Advisory bodies.

KS HR6003

Providing temporary rules of the House of Representatives for the 2023 session until permanent rules are adopted.