Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB495

Introduced
2/13/25  
Refer
2/14/25  
Refer
3/4/25  
Enrolled
4/18/25  

Caption

Repeal federal mandates act

Impact

The repeal of the Federal Mandates Act may have significant implications for state laws and the way state agencies interact with federal regulations. By eliminating the relevant sections of the Montana Code Annotated, the bill removes the framework that required state agencies to report on federal mandates and their implications. This could lead to a reduced level of accountability regarding how federal laws impact state programs and outcomes. The legislative approval indicates a shift toward a more state-centric approach to governance.

Summary

House Bill 495 seeks to repeal the Federal Mandates Act in Montana, effectively eliminating sections of the state code that pertain to federal mandates and their associated reporting requirements. This legislative change aims to streamline operations and reduce the administrative burden associated with federal reporting obligations. The bill appears to reflect a broader trend of state-level efforts to minimize federal influence and assert greater autonomy in governance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 495 is mixed, with supporters praising the bill for reducing unnecessary bureaucratic layers and increasing the autonomy of state governance. However, critics express concerns that this could lead to reduced oversight and potential neglect of federal requirements that may benefit state citizens. As such, there appears to be an ongoing debate about the balance between state independence and necessary federal oversight.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns raised by some legislators about the potential consequences of relinquishing state oversight of federal mandates. Opponents argue that repealing these requirements could affect the state's ability to address issues governed by federal standards, particularly in areas such as public health, safety, and funding. The divided opinion highlights a fundamental disagreement about the role of the federal government in state affairs and the responsibilities of state lawmakers in ensuring both compliance and legislating effectively.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT HB89

Revise laws related to Montana national guard life insurance and court martials

MT HB52

Revising common carrier regulation

MT HB343

Generally revise library geospatial and natural resource information laws

MT SB35

Repeal business and industrial development corporations

MT HB267

Create SAFER account for federal highway grants

MT HB106

Revise laws related to federal mitigation funding

MT SB33

Repealing class C motor carrier regulations

MT HB152

Revise laws related to professional and occupational licensure

MT HB569

Generally revise pension laws

MT HB676

Revise laws to clarify fundamental parental rights

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.