Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana House Bill HB614

Introduced
2/20/25  
Refer
2/21/25  
Engrossed
3/7/25  
Refer
3/14/25  
Enrolled
4/10/25  
Enrolled
4/10/25  

Caption

Allow for the termination of certain county zoning districts

Impact

The implementation of HB 614 would impact the governance of zoning districts in Montana. By allowing for the termination of zoning districts, the bill could facilitate the consolidation of land use planning efforts and streamline zoning regulations in alignment with broader land use objectives. Counties that adopt the Montana Land Use Planning Act will have the option to terminate smaller districts if they are to be incorporated into larger zoning frameworks, potentially enhancing overall land use efficiency.

Summary

House Bill 614 aims to revise county zoning laws in Montana by providing a mechanism for the termination of zoning districts under specific conditions. The bill permits real property owners in a zoning district to petition the board of county commissioners to submit a referendum for terminating their zoning district. This process requires the petition to be signed by at least 20% of the property owners within the district, and upon validation, the county clerk and recorder will facilitate the referendum voting process for district residents. If the referendum fails, property owners are restricted from submitting another petition for a subsequent three years.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 614 appears to be pragmatic, with supporters advocating for local control and flexibility in zoning. However, there is a potential for contention as different stakeholders may have diverse opinions on zoning regulations. Some community members may welcome the opportunity to dissolve unproductive zoning districts, while others may worry about the implications of losing localized zoning controls that cater to specific community needs.

Contention

Notable points of contention could arise regarding the balance of power between county commissioners and local property owners. Some may argue that the three-year restriction on resubmitting a termination petition post-referendum compromises community autonomy. Additionally, there may be concerns about potential conflicts over zoning practices and the influence of state-level planning mandates, particularly if larger zoning districts do not adequately address local issues or preferences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MT SB143

Allow for a referendum to terminate citizen initiated zoning district

MT HB618

Revise laws related to special districts

MT HB813

Allow for the creation of fire protection authorities

MT HB774

Generally revise election laws

MT HB246

Allow for the zoning of tiny dwelling units

MT SB336

Allow for the creation of ambulance districts

MT HB789

Revise laws related to the alteration of county boundaries

MT HB748

Allow zoning for separation of incompatible uses of property

MT SB435

Require hand counting as the official manner of counting ballots

MT HB707

Allow certain elementary districts to create new high school district

Similar Bills

IN SB0039

Referendum property tax levy for parks.

MN HF2944

Board of a consolidated school district authorized to renew an expiring referendum established pursuant to the consolidation, and requirements for school board renewal of an expiring referendum clarified.

MN SF3163

Board of a consolidated school district renewal of an expiring referendum established pursuant to the consolidation authorization; requirements for school board renewal of an expiring referendum clarification

CA SB443

Emergency medical services (EMS): prehospital EMS.

IL HB3226

TAXPAYER PROTECTION ACT

IL HB3177

TAXPAYER PROTECTION ACT

ME LD1786

An Act to Repeal and Replace the Charter of the Boothbay-Boothbay Harbor Community School District

TX SB509

Relating to the establishment by school districts of a school security district; authorizing school district taxes for crime prevention measures.