Montana 2025 Regular Session

Montana Senate Bill SB511

Introduced
2/25/25  
Refer
2/26/25  
Engrossed
3/7/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Enrolled
4/11/25  

Caption

Generally revising laws related to litigation financing

Impact

If enacted, SB 511 will amend several sections of Montana Code Annotated regarding litigation financing. It introduces stringent requirements for transparency among litigation financers, particularly those who may have foreign affiliations. Litigation financers will be required to disclose affiliations and funding sources, thereby allowing for greater scrutiny of their operations and ensuring local consumers are safeguarded from possibly predatory practices.

Summary

Senate Bill 511 aims to revise laws related to litigation financing in the state, primarily targeting the regulation of foreign entities involved in such financing. The bill seeks to enhance transparency and consumer protection by prohibiting foreign adversaries and persons of concern from engaging in litigation financing activities. Such measures are deemed essential to protect the local legal landscape from potential foreign influence, which proponents argue may compromise the integrity and equity of legal proceedings within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 511 appears to be largely supportive among its proponents, with strong endorsements from legislators advocating for robust consumer protection measures. However, there are concerns raised by opponents regarding the feasibility of the enforcement of such regulations and the obstacles they may pose for both local and foreign businesses looking to engage in litigation financing. The division in sentiment illustrates a tension between national security interests and the facilitation of legal remedies for local consumers.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the classification of what constitutes a 'foreign adversary,' which may impact numerous businesses operating within the state. Critics argue that the broad definitions could unfairly target legitimate financing efforts, while proponents maintain that such measures are crucial to maintaining the integrity of the state's legal system. The debate reflects underlying concerns about foreign influence in important sectors of the economy and law, aligning with national trends towards safeguarding domestic interests against external pressures.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

LA HB537

Provides for a prohibition against foreign adversary purchasing, leasing, or acquiring land (EN GF EX See Note)

IN HB1179

State educational institutions.

OH HB212

Enact the Ohio Property Protection Act

TX HB4195

Relating to contracts with and the acceptance of money from certain foreign sources by public schools and public institutions of higher education; providing administrative penalties.

MS HB600

Lobbying law; require registration statement to include information about foreign adversaries and foreign principals.

MS HB1327

Lobbying law; require registration statement to include information about foreign adversaries and foreign principals.

MS SB2890

Registered lobbyists; require disclosure of representation of foreign adversary client.

LA HB125

Provides relative to agriculture land protection against foreign adversaries (EN INCREASE GF EX See Note)