North Carolina 2023-2024 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H682

Introduced
4/18/23  

Caption

Strengthen Do Not Call/Text Registry

Impact

If passed, the bill would amend current state laws concerning unsolicited telephone solicitations, providing clearer definitions and more rigorous requirements for compliance. It specifically targets telephone solicitors, including businesses and individuals, mandating them to remove numbers from their call lists within a specified period when consumers express a desire not to receive calls. This legislative change is meant to minimize disruptions for residents and give them more control over their personal phone lines, aligning the state's laws more closely with consumer expectations regarding privacy and telecommunications.

Summary

House Bill 682, titled 'Strengthen Do Not Call/Text Registry', aims to bolster the existing regulations imposed on telephone solicitations. The bill seeks to update the legal definitions related to telephone solicitors and their practices, establishing stricter guidelines for how they may contact consumers. A significant aspect of the bill involves enhancing the Do Not Call Registry and enforcing stronger penalties for those who violate these regulations. This is intended to provide additional protections for North Carolina consumers from unwanted telemarketing calls and texts.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 682 appears largely positive among consumer advocacy groups and individuals who have previously expressed dissatisfaction with ongoing telemarketing practices. Supporters argue that the measures outlined in the bill would significantly enhance consumer safeguards in a rapidly changing digital communication landscape. However, there may be opposing perspectives from telemarketing sectors, which could view these regulations as excessive, potentially limiting their outreach and sales strategies, yet there isn't a widely reported organized resistance against the bill in discussions thus far.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention involves the balance between consumer protection and business operations. While the bill is framed as a necessary step towards consumer privacy, concerns may arise regarding the implications for legitimate businesses that rely on telemarketing as a key component of their marketing strategies. Additionally, discussions around the implementation and enforcement of the proposed regulations could also uncover potential challenges, particularly with respect to identifying and penalizing violators of the updated Do Not Call provisions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA SB1339

Virginia Telephone Privacy Protection Act; telephone solicitations by text message, effective date.

CA AB2021

Solicitations: do not contact list.

MS HB1350

Telephone solicitors; prohibit from making any solicitation regarding Medicare Advantage Plans and Medicare supplements.

CT SB00209

An Act Prohibiting Unsolicited Commercial Text Messages And Increasing Penalties For Violations Of The Do Not Call Registry.

ME LD2234

An Act to Require Telephone Solicitors to Use the Reassigned Numbers Database

NC H936

Robocall Solicitation Modifications

CT HB05089

An Act Prohibiting Telemarketers From Transmitting Inaccurate Or Misleading Caller Identification Information.

MS HB1177

Telephone solicitors; revise certain provisions regarding Medicare Advantage and Supplement plans.