North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H295

Introduced
3/5/25  
Refer
3/6/25  
Report Pass
3/26/25  
Refer
3/26/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  
Engrossed
4/3/25  

Caption

Req. DOT to Install Prop. Corner Markers

Impact

The bill's impact primarily centers on enhancing the accuracy and transparency of property-related information in transportation projects. By instituting mandatory installation of property corner markers, it aims to mitigate disputes over property boundaries that could arise after road construction or modifications. Additionally, this measure aims to align DOT practices with professional surveying methodologies, thereby providing a structured approach to recognizing and documenting property corners in the context of road projects.

Summary

House Bill 295 requires the North Carolina Department of Transportation (DOT) to install property corner markers along specified property acquisitions following project completions. The bill outlines that any right-of-way or permanent easement acquisition plans must include precise drawings highlighting property lines, right-of-way lines, and corner markers. The intent is to clarify property boundaries for future reference and legal purposes, ensuring that such data is well-documented according to established surveying standards.

Sentiment

Discussions around HB 295 have been generally supportive, with most stakeholders recognizing the need for clear property boundaries in transportation planning. Proponents of the bill have emphasized that inaccurately placed boundaries can lead to significant legal disputes and complications in land use, thus supporting the implementation of systematic corner marking. There seems to be widespread agreement on the practicality of the proposal, as it addresses an existing gap in property documentation within transportation projects.

Contention

Despite a positive reception, there could be concerns from landowners regarding the implications of having their property lines marked by the state, as this may influence perceptions of ownership and boundary rights. Moving forward, it will be important to ensure that property owners are adequately informed about the process and potential impacts on their land. Addressing these concerns preemptively could play a crucial role in facilitating smoother implementation of the bill and promoting trust between the DOT and affected communities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

VA HB1721

Condemnation of conservation or open-space easement; compensation, Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

TX SB1009

Relating to the adoption of the Uniform Easement Relocation Act.

TX SB1560

Relating to easements used for dune construction and maintenance projects in certain counties.

TX HB3403

Relating to the operation of an unmanned aircraft that is outside the direct line of sight of the operator of the aircraft; creating a criminal offense; imposing a fee.

AZ SB1549

Conservation easements; valuation

OK HB1060

Easements; the Oklahoma Uniform Easement Relocation Act of 2025; easement relocation; court orders; effective date.

OK HB2119

Easements; the Oklahoma Uniform Easement Relocation Act of 2025; easement relocation; court orders; effective date.

GA HR98

Property; granting of nonexclusive easements; authorize