North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H335

Introduced
3/6/25  
Refer
3/10/25  
Report Pass
4/8/25  

Caption

Expand Emergency Judge Eligibility

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to have a significant impact on the state's legal proceedings by enhancing the capacity of the courts to deal with fluctuating caseloads. It allows for a more flexible deployment of judiciary resources, particularly in times of crisis or increased demand, thereby maintaining access to justice for the public. By enabling a broader pool of retired judges to serve in emergencies, the bill supports the overall efficiency of the judicial process in North Carolina.

Summary

House Bill 335 seeks to expand the eligibility criteria for emergency judges within the North Carolina judicial system. Specifically, this bill allows judges who have retired after serving as both a superior court judge and a district court judge to serve as emergency judges in either court. The aim is to increase the number of available emergency judges, which can be critical in times of judicial overload or emergencies where additional judicial resources are required to maintain court functions and provide timely justice.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards HB 335 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers. Proponents argue that the bill promotes the optimal use of experienced judicial figures who can step in during critical times, thereby enhancing the responsiveness of the judicial system. However, there may be some concerns around the selection process for emergency judges and ensuring the quality and qualifications of those who serve in such critical roles.

Contention

While there is no significant opposition highlighted in the discussions around HB 335, some potential points of contention could arise regarding how the Chief Justice manages the assignment of emergency judges or how the expanded eligibility may affect perceptions of retired judges returning to service. These concerns might involve discussions about maintaining judicial quality and ensuring that the selection process is transparent and equitable.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB594

Elections: redistricting.

CA AB1513

Recall elections: superior courts.

NH HB1597

Permitting arraignments for felonies and preliminary examinations to be heard in circuit court.

DC B25-0485

Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act of 2023

ME LD1192

An Act Regarding the Composition of the Judiciary

MA H1725

Relative to the Commonwealth’s right to appeal bail decisions

MA H1937

Relative to the Commonwealth’s right to appeal bail decisions

CA AB972

Local Assistance and Grant Program Streamlining Workgroup.