North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina House Bill H397

Introduced
3/13/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
3/25/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Report Pass
4/1/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  
Engrossed
4/10/25  

Caption

Use of Epinephrine Nasal Spray

Impact

The passage of HB 397 will amend existing North Carolina laws concerning how schools prepare to handle allergic reactions, especially in children. Schools will be required to maintain a supply of emergency epinephrine delivery systems and ensure all personnel involved receive training on recognizing anaphylaxis and managing the associated risks. This proactive measure is set to enhance student safety and well-being, particularly for those at risk of severe allergic reactions.

Summary

House Bill 397, also known as the Use of Epinephrine Nasal Spray Act, seeks to improve the availability of emergency treatments for anaphylaxis in educational settings by authorizing schools to stock epinephrine nasal sprays in addition to traditional auto-injectors. This bill establishes a framework for local boards of education to adopt protective policies, enabling students with asthma or those susceptible to anaphylactic reactions to carry and self-administer necessary medications. The legislation emphasizes the importance of having trained personnel in schools to manage potential emergencies effectively.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 397 appears generally supportive, as it addresses a critical health issue that impacts many students. Educational professionals, healthcare advocates, and parents have largely lauded the efforts to enhance safety protocols within school settings. However, some discussions highlighted concerns around the adequacy of training for non-medical staff and the potential for liability issues related to administering the medication in emergencies.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the prescribed training and the responsibility it places on non-medical personnel in schools. While supporters argue that the bill's provisions will lead to better outcomes for students experiencing anaphylaxis, critics are wary about whether schools are equipped to handle emergencies effectively and if the implementation will be a burden on already stretched resources. The debate continues to revolve around balancing safety with practicality in ensuring school environments remain secure for vulnerable students.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

PA HB1044

In epinephrine auto-injector entities, further providing for scope of chapter, for definitions and for epinephrine auto-injectors for authorized entities; and making an editorial change.

CA SB568

Pupil health: epinephrine delivery systems: public schools and programs.

MN SF2690

Requirements modification for access to epinephrine in schools

MN HF2489

Epinephrine access in schools requirements modified.

IL HB3454

EPINEPHRINE DELIVERY DEVICE

IL HB2462

DILLON’S LAW

TX HB2283

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery device by certain entities.

TX SB1619

Relating to the use of an epinephrine delivery device by certain entities.