GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2025
H 1
HOUSE BILL 789
Short Title: Mitigating Factor/Pretrial Use of IID. (Public)
Sponsors: Representatives Schietzelt, Chesser, Reeder, and Carson Smith (Primary
Sponsors).
For a complete list of sponsors, refer to the North Carolina General Assembly web site.
Referred to: Judiciary 2, if favorable, Rules, Calendar, and Operations of the House
April 8, 2025
*H789 -v-1*
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED 1
AN ACT TO ESTABLISH A MITIGATING FACTOR FOR CERTAIN PERSONS CHARGED 2
WITH IMPAIRED DRIVING WHO VOLUNTARILY EQ UIP AND OPERATE A MOTOR 3
VEHICLE WITH AN IGNITION INTERLOCK SYSTEM PRIOR TO TRIAL. 4
The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts: 5
SECTION 1. The purpose of this act is to do all of the following: 6
(1) Incentivize certain persons accused of impaired driving to install an ignition 7
interlock system prior to the individual's trial to serve as a potential mitigating 8
factor at sentencing. 9
(2) Encourage responsible behavior and compliance with ignition interlock 10
system requirements. 11
(3) Reduce instances of repeat impaired driving offenses by introducing early 12
intervention measures. 13
SECTION 2. G.S. 20-179(e) reads as rewritten: 14
"(e) Mitigating Factors to Be Weighed. – The judge shall also determine before sentencing 15
under subsection (f) of this section whether any of the mitigating factors listed below apply to 16
the defendant. The judge shall weigh the degree of mitigation of each factor in light of the 17
particular circumstances of the case. The factors are: 18
… 19
(6a) Completion of a substance abuse assessment, compliance with its 20
recommendations, and simultaneously maintaining 60 days of continuous 21
abstinence from alcohol consumption, as proven by a continuous alcohol 22
monitoring system. The continuous alcohol monitoring system shall be of a 23
type approved by the Division of Community Supervision and Reentry of the 24
Department of Adult Correction. 25
(6b) Prior to trial, the defendant voluntarily equipped a designated motor vehicle 26
with a functioning ignition interlock system of a type approved by the 27
Commissioner, regularly used the ignition interlock system for a minimum of 28
six months, and produced evidence satisfactory to the judge that the defendant 29
did not start the vehicle with an alcohol concentration greater than 0.02 or 30
commit any other acts that would be considered violations of the interlock 31
policies established by the Division for use of an ignition interlock system or 32
a violation of G.S. 20-17.8A. The factor set forth in this subdivision only 33
applies to a defendant who meets all of the following requirements: 34 General Assembly Of North Carolina Session 2025
Page 2 House Bill 789-First Edition
a. The defendant was charged with an offense under G.S. 20-138.1. 1
b. The vehicle being operated by the defendant was not involved at the 2
time of the offense in a crash resulting in the serious injury or death of 3
a person. 4
c. At the time of the offense, the defendant held either a valid driver's 5
license or a license that had been expired for less than one year. 6
d. At the time of the offense, the defendant did not have an additional 7
unresolved pending charge involving impaired driving, or an 8
additional conviction of an offense involving impaired driving within 9
the five years preceding the date of the offense. 10
e. At the time of the offense the person did not have an alcohol 11
concentration of 0.15 or more. 12
f. The defendant equipped the designated motor vehicle with an ignition 13
interlock system no later than 45 days after being charged with the 14
offense. 15
g. The defendant only operated the designated motor vehicle with a 16
limited driving privilege that is valid in this State or during a time 17
when the defendant's driver's license was not revoked or suspended. 18
(7) Any other factor that mitigates the seriousness of the offense. 19
Except for the factors in subdivisions (4), (6), (6a), (6b), and (7) of this subsection, the conduct 20
constituting the mitigating factor shall occur during the same transaction or occurrence as the 21
impaired driving offense." 22
SECTION 3. G.S. 20-179.5 reads as rewritten: 23
"§ 20-179.5. Affordability of ignition interlock system. 24
(a) Payment of Costs. – The costs incurred in order to comply with the ignition interlock 25
requirements imposed by the court or the Division pursuant to this Chapter, including costs for 26
installation and monitoring of the ignition interlock system, shall be paid by the person ordered 27
to install the system. The costs incurred from voluntarily installing an ignition interlock system, 28
including costs for monitoring the ignition interlock system, shall be paid by the person 29
voluntarily installing the system. Costs for installation and monitoring of the ignition interlock 30
system shall be collected under terms agreed upon by the ignition interlock system vendor and 31
the person required to install install, or voluntarily installing, the ignition interlock system. 32
(b) Waiver. – A person who is ordered by a court, or required by statute, to install an 33
ignition interlock system in order to lawfully operate a motor vehicle, but who is unable to afford 34
the cost of an ignition interlock system, may apply to an authorized vendor for a waiver of a 35
portion of the costs of an ignition interlock system. Additionally, a person meeting the 36
requirements set forth in sub-subdivisions a. through f. of subdivision (6b) of subsection (e) of 37
G.S. 20-179 who is unable to afford the cost of an ignition interlock system may apply to an 38
authorized vendor for a waiver of a portion of the costs of an ignition interlock system. 39
…." 40
SECTION 4. This act becomes effective December 1, 2025, and applies to offenses 41
committed on or after that date. 42