The bill mandates a comprehensive study by the North Carolina Collaboratory at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to review current approval processes for surface water transfers. This includes examining the environmental impact studies required for such transfers, economic considerations for affected communities, and the implications of climate change on water flow in the state's river systems. By delaying new significant transfer approvals until March 1, 2027, the bill intends to ensure that all potential impacts are considered before further approvals are granted.
Summary
House Bill 850, known as the Surface Water Transfer Moratorium, introduces a temporary moratorium on the issuance of certificates for certain significant surface water transfers in North Carolina. The bill aims to evaluate and update the state's regulations related to surface water transfers, which have been in place for over 30 years. The decision to impose a moratorium is driven by the necessity to reassess these regulations in light of significant economic growth, population increases, and the impacts of natural disasters on water resources over the decades.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding House Bill 850 is largely supportive among environmentalists and communities concerned about equitable resource management. Proponents of the bill emphasize the need for a thorough review of existing regulations to prevent adverse impacts on riverine ecosystems and downstream water users. However, there is some contention from stakeholders in industries reliant on interbasin transfers, who may view the moratorium as a hindrance to economic development and water management strategies.
Contention
Key points of contention include whether the bill could stifle necessary water resource management in growing regions of the state and the potential negative economic implications for communities and industries dependent on water transfers. While the intention is to protect the environment and promote fair practices, critics argue that prolonged discussions and studies could delay necessary infrastructure projects and lead to increased costs for utilities and consumers due to inadequate water resources.