North Carolina 2025-2026 Regular Session

North Carolina Senate Bill S472

Introduced
3/24/25  
Refer
3/25/25  
Refer
4/1/25  
Report Pass
4/9/25  
Refer
4/9/25  
Report Pass
4/16/25  
Refer
4/16/25  

Caption

Amend 401 Certification Process

Impact

The implications of SB 472 extend to state environmental regulations and the operational framework of the DEQ. By instituting a more streamlined review process for water quality certifications, the bill intends to facilitate faster project execution, potentially benefiting sectors like construction and development. This change could impact local stakeholders engaged in projects requiring federal permits, as they would face reduced waiting times for essential certifications needed to proceed with their developments.

Summary

Senate Bill 472 proposes significant modifications to the process for obtaining water quality certifications in North Carolina. The bill aims to expedite the approval process by requiring the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to review and decide on applications within five business days of receipt. If the Department fails to act within this timeframe, the certification requirement would be waived. The legislation seeks to enhance efficiency in project approvals and align with federally issued Nationwide Permits issued by the United States Army Corps of Engineers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 472 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the expedited process supports economic growth by removing bureaucratic hurdles that delay project implementations. They emphasize the need for a more agile regulatory framework that can better serve businesses and contractors. Conversely, critics may express concerns about the potential for hasty approval processes leading to inadequate environmental assessments, thus risking harm to local ecosystems and water sources.

Contention

Notable points of contention in the bill revolve around the balance between regulatory efficiency and environmental protection. Critics may argue that the expedited review process could compromise thorough evaluations of applications, increasing the potential for negative environmental consequences. Concerns could also be raised about public transparency and participation in the certification process, as faster approvals may limit opportunities for community input on projects that may affect local water quality.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB720

Environmental education: environmental principles and concepts.

CA AB1288

Registered environmental health specialists.

IL HB2521

ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ACT

CA SB424

The California Regional Environmental Education Community Network.

CA AB649

Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery: Office of Environmental Justice and Tribal Relations.

MI HB4961

Education: curriculum; environmental literacy task force to develop environmental literacy model curriculum and report on the curriculum; provide for. Amends 1976 PA 451 (MCL 380.1 - 380.1852) by adding sec. 1159.

AZ HB2681

Environmental justice; task force

HI SB1277

Relating To Environmental Justice Mapping.